Phil Davis

You're arguing about semantics and wording and bits and bobs.

And I think it comes back to lots of other things.

We have to be comfortable with getting things wrong.

And we will live with that.

But if someone just said, hey, these are all the facts.

You've discussed it in a forum.

I, whoever is appointed with such thing, who has a huge history in the game and understand the rule, understand the big picture goes, I will give you X weeks.

Done.

And that's all we can do.

We have to trust that system.

And if they get it wrong by a week or two or $5,000 or whatever it is, we'll get wrong with it.

But I don't think we should be brought down by the semantics that comes with lawyers when it gets so far removed from the essence of the game.

Unfortunately, we've seen suicide, there are divorces, there's financial distress, there's mental health issues.

All these things that we're seeing across the plethora of players at the moment.

And if we come back to mental health, which to me is probably the number one, we go, well, what are the systems in place?

Yep, every club has two PDMs, one in charge of sort of like the indigenous part of the program, the other broadly.

And then we also generally have a psychologist.

If you look at what's on their remit, two PDMs, play development managers, sorry, just doesn't get it done with what's required.

If you want to incorporate mental health and making sure players are attuned to that, it doesn't seem like it's cutting it.

And then I think, what about our psychology programs?