Phil Holloway

Heck no.

It's got to be these prosecutors hold him in the worst regard and they went after him, not because he violated the law, but because they have personal vendetta against him and just can't stand him.

There's no evidence of that.

I don't think that that's there.

Yes, and as we all learned when we went to law school, the First Amendment gives you wide latitude to spew outrageous and offensive speech

The question is whether this is primarily opinion and it looks that way.

There's a few facts that he'll say, well, I said in good conscience, it doesn't mean that they're actually true.

He doesn't have to be truthful.

Again, she has to prove actual malice that he knew it was false or a reckless disregard of the truth.

Very high standard, as you have learned, Megan.

So I don't think this lawsuit goes anywhere against this guy.

It doesn't mean that I'm in favor of what he says, and it doesn't mean that it's factual.

I have no idea if what he's saying is truthful.

But I love our First Amendment, and it gives us wide latitude to say a lot of things you don't always have to be right.

Okay, it plays well for Melania in the court of public opinion because people like you give the impression, I think, or people are getting the impression that the daily, what is it, beast mail?

Beast.

Which one?

Yeah, beast.

Somehow then pulled it because what he's saying might be false.

They could be pulling it for many other reasons.