Pierre Poilievre

Look, he's going to try and distance himself now, but here's the problem. He signed on as Trudeau's economic advisor. It's an official role he holds today. Now, he's going to make one of two arguments. One, he's going to say, yes, in fact, I was his economic advisor, and therefore I am responsible for the $62 billion deficit and the catastrophic growth, the rising cost of living.

Look, he's going to try and distance himself now, but here's the problem. He signed on as Trudeau's economic advisor. It's an official role he holds today. Now, he's going to make one of two arguments. One, he's going to say, yes, in fact, I was his economic advisor, and therefore I am responsible for the $62 billion deficit and the catastrophic growth, the rising cost of living.

Or he's going to say, I wasn't really his advisor. I was just full of it. You know, he has to decide. Was he lying to everybody when he claimed he was Trudeau's advisor? Or was he telling the truth? And either way, he's got a major political problem that he is now totally inseparable from the Trudeau record. He supports the carbon tax. He supports the attack on our energy sector.

Or he's going to say, I wasn't really his advisor. I was just full of it. You know, he has to decide. Was he lying to everybody when he claimed he was Trudeau's advisor? Or was he telling the truth? And either way, he's got a major political problem that he is now totally inseparable from the Trudeau record. He supports the carbon tax. He supports the attack on our energy sector.

Or he's going to say, I wasn't really his advisor. I was just full of it. You know, he has to decide. Was he lying to everybody when he claimed he was Trudeau's advisor? Or was he telling the truth? And either way, he's got a major political problem that he is now totally inseparable from the Trudeau record. He supports the carbon tax. He supports the attack on our energy sector.

He told me in a parliamentary committee that he opposed Canadian pipelines, even though his company has invested in pipelines in the Middle East and in Brazil. He is part of the Davos agenda. He's just every bit as radical as Trudeau. The only difference is he's got a nice business banker's haircut and suit, and he wears navy blue socks rather than polka dot socks.

He told me in a parliamentary committee that he opposed Canadian pipelines, even though his company has invested in pipelines in the Middle East and in Brazil. He is part of the Davos agenda. He's just every bit as radical as Trudeau. The only difference is he's got a nice business banker's haircut and suit, and he wears navy blue socks rather than polka dot socks.

He told me in a parliamentary committee that he opposed Canadian pipelines, even though his company has invested in pipelines in the Middle East and in Brazil. He is part of the Davos agenda. He's just every bit as radical as Trudeau. The only difference is he's got a nice business banker's haircut and suit, and he wears navy blue socks rather than polka dot socks.

But beyond the aesthetics, he shares Trudeau's entire ideology, and he represents the status quo.

But beyond the aesthetics, he shares Trudeau's entire ideology, and he represents the status quo.

But beyond the aesthetics, he shares Trudeau's entire ideology, and he represents the status quo.

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

Right.

Right.

Right.

They get the party, I get the hangover.

They get the party, I get the hangover.

They get the party, I get the hangover.