Pierre Poilievre

These guys could have got rid of Trudeau a year and a half ago. They knew he was a disaster then. And now they say, well, we're low in the polls, so we have to get rid of him. Now, you didn't care when he was just depriving single mothers of food for their kids or doubling housing costs or unleashing crime in neighborhoods across the country. But now...

You're really concerned about getting rid of him because your poll numbers are down. You want to keep your job. Sorry, that's not a good reason to paralyze the entire country in the face, by the way, of a major negotiation with the incoming U.S. president who enters with a massive and powerful mandate and a man who has proven that he can spot weakness from a mile away.

You're really concerned about getting rid of him because your poll numbers are down. You want to keep your job. Sorry, that's not a good reason to paralyze the entire country in the face, by the way, of a major negotiation with the incoming U.S. president who enters with a massive and powerful mandate and a man who has proven that he can spot weakness from a mile away.

You're really concerned about getting rid of him because your poll numbers are down. You want to keep your job. Sorry, that's not a good reason to paralyze the entire country in the face, by the way, of a major negotiation with the incoming U.S. president who enters with a massive and powerful mandate and a man who has proven that he can spot weakness from a mile away.

So the country should not be forced to wait for the Liberal Party to to clean up its own mess. They've had plenty of time to do that. What we need now is certainty. And the only way that can come is through an election so the people can decide.

So the country should not be forced to wait for the Liberal Party to to clean up its own mess. They've had plenty of time to do that. What we need now is certainty. And the only way that can come is through an election so the people can decide.

So the country should not be forced to wait for the Liberal Party to to clean up its own mess. They've had plenty of time to do that. What we need now is certainty. And the only way that can come is through an election so the people can decide.

After accepting it. After accepting it. Well, so the chronology that we're led to believe, based on sources who've spoken about it to the media... is that Carney agreed to the job. Trudeau went to Freeland days before she was to introduce her fall update and said, I'm going to be firing you to bring in Mark Carney.

After accepting it. After accepting it. Well, so the chronology that we're led to believe, based on sources who've spoken about it to the media... is that Carney agreed to the job. Trudeau went to Freeland days before she was to introduce her fall update and said, I'm going to be firing you to bring in Mark Carney.

After accepting it. After accepting it. Well, so the chronology that we're led to believe, based on sources who've spoken about it to the media... is that Carney agreed to the job. Trudeau went to Freeland days before she was to introduce her fall update and said, I'm going to be firing you to bring in Mark Carney.

And then when that blew up with her unexpected premature resignation, then Carney looked at it and said, I don't want any part of this. And he... crawled under his desk. And so he was happy to take the job when it looked like it was a clear path, but then when it was a messier path, he hid from it.

And then when that blew up with her unexpected premature resignation, then Carney looked at it and said, I don't want any part of this. And he... crawled under his desk. And so he was happy to take the job when it looked like it was a clear path, but then when it was a messier path, he hid from it.

And then when that blew up with her unexpected premature resignation, then Carney looked at it and said, I don't want any part of this. And he... crawled under his desk. And so he was happy to take the job when it looked like it was a clear path, but then when it was a messier path, he hid from it.

It's a good question.

It's a good question.

It's a good question.

Who would want to associate with these guys?

Who would want to associate with these guys?

Who would want to associate with these guys?

Look, he's going to try and distance himself now, but here's the problem. He signed on as Trudeau's economic advisor. It's an official role he holds today. Now, he's going to make one of two arguments. One, he's going to say, yes, in fact, I was his economic advisor, and therefore I am responsible for the $62 billion deficit and the catastrophic growth, the rising cost of living.