Professor Alison Wood Brooks

And because it feels like I'm speaking to ChachiBT.

They were really thankful and they completely changed and it completely, immediately, even though I now know they're still using, it's so crazy because I know they're still using it.

They've built this bot basically for this particular part of feedback, which they're using.

All they've done is change the prompt into their bot to make it sound a little bit more human.

And I'm now reading it again because I can't tell the difference.

I'll tell you the context.

It's interview feedback.

So they're interviewing someone and then the feedback they're sending me was written by AI.

I trust their experience and their intuition and their ability just to feel someone.

I don't know if I trust ChatGPT to interview my candidates.

So I just wanted to feel like I was getting it from that person.

And they preferred it?

That's a risky experiment.

So they don't want to ask dumb questions, right?

I think as well that in a world of AI and robots, it's going to be very tempting to overlook the most human skills.

And those that don't, those that fight against the ease of allowing a chatbot to speak for you will develop a superpower, one that's going to be even more scarce in the future, which is all the things you've said in this framework.

Like really understanding how to be with a person IRL and have great conversations, I think is going to be such a superpower.

The irreplaceably human stuff.

I think you were talking about boomers earlier on.

I think boomers are much better conversationalists than Gen Zers.