Professor Nicole Hemmer
đ€ PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
So once you get in and people pay thousands of dollars to get into the United States, to get smuggled in, they risk their lives crossing Mexico, crossing the border. And so they're not going to go through that again. Once they get in the United States, they're going to stay. And they'll send money back to Mexico, certainly. But they're not going to go back and forth anymore.
So once you get in and people pay thousands of dollars to get into the United States, to get smuggled in, they risk their lives crossing Mexico, crossing the border. And so they're not going to go through that again. Once they get in the United States, they're going to stay. And they'll send money back to Mexico, certainly. But they're not going to go back and forth anymore.
And so you get a population that is staying. Right. But I like what you say. It became seen as an invasion instead of the normal way it was seen in the past, which was kind of a circular migration. Right.
And so you get a population that is staying. Right. But I like what you say. It became seen as an invasion instead of the normal way it was seen in the past, which was kind of a circular migration. Right.
And so you get a population that is staying. Right. But I like what you say. It became seen as an invasion instead of the normal way it was seen in the past, which was kind of a circular migration. Right.
Yeah, exactly. When Mexico does well, the United States does well. Instead of viewing it as a competition, for a lot of history it has been a partnership, where you can see both economies are extremely connected, intimately connected. U.S. investment in Mexico, Mexican labor in the United States, it's all of a piece, right? And so this idea that It's a zero-sum game is not actually accurate.
Yeah, exactly. When Mexico does well, the United States does well. Instead of viewing it as a competition, for a lot of history it has been a partnership, where you can see both economies are extremely connected, intimately connected. U.S. investment in Mexico, Mexican labor in the United States, it's all of a piece, right? And so this idea that It's a zero-sum game is not actually accurate.
Yeah, exactly. When Mexico does well, the United States does well. Instead of viewing it as a competition, for a lot of history it has been a partnership, where you can see both economies are extremely connected, intimately connected. U.S. investment in Mexico, Mexican labor in the United States, it's all of a piece, right? And so this idea that It's a zero-sum game is not actually accurate.
That's not how it's developed. That's not how either economy has developed.
That's not how it's developed. That's not how either economy has developed.
That's not how it's developed. That's not how either economy has developed.
Ja, und das ist tatsĂ€chlich wĂ€hrend der Mexikanischen Revolution. Sie passen eine Konstitution, die Konstitution von 1917, die sagt, dass alle mexikanischen Territorien und alles unterhalb, insbesondere Minen, Ăl, zu der mexikanischen Nation gehört. Und so kommt das aus der RevolutionĂ€r-Ăra, aber sie fordern diese Konstitution nicht fĂŒr ein bisschen.
Ja, und das ist tatsĂ€chlich wĂ€hrend der Mexikanischen Revolution. Sie passen eine Konstitution, die Konstitution von 1917, die sagt, dass alle mexikanischen Territorien und alles unterhalb, insbesondere Minen, Ăl, zu der mexikanischen Nation gehört. Und so kommt das aus der RevolutionĂ€r-Ăra, aber sie fordern diese Konstitution nicht fĂŒr ein bisschen.
Ja, und das ist tatsĂ€chlich wĂ€hrend der Mexikanischen Revolution. Sie passen eine Konstitution, die Konstitution von 1917, die sagt, dass alle mexikanischen Territorien und alles unterhalb, insbesondere Minen, Ăl, zu der mexikanischen Nation gehört. Und so kommt das aus der RevolutionĂ€r-Ăra, aber sie fordern diese Konstitution nicht fĂŒr ein bisschen.
Sie sind beschÀftigt, Nationen zu bauen und Dinge nach der Mexikanischen Revolution zusammenzubringen. But then by the 1930s, you do have a government that is becoming more nationalist, especially under President Låzaro Cårdenas. And so he decides to nationalize Mexico's oil industry in 1938, like you mentioned.
Sie sind beschÀftigt, Nationen zu bauen und Dinge nach der Mexikanischen Revolution zusammenzubringen. But then by the 1930s, you do have a government that is becoming more nationalist, especially under President Låzaro Cårdenas. And so he decides to nationalize Mexico's oil industry in 1938, like you mentioned.
Sie sind beschÀftigt, Nationen zu bauen und Dinge nach der Mexikanischen Revolution zusammenzubringen. But then by the 1930s, you do have a government that is becoming more nationalist, especially under President Låzaro Cårdenas. And so he decides to nationalize Mexico's oil industry in 1938, like you mentioned.