Rachel Abrams
👤 SpeakerVoice Profile Active
This person's voice can be automatically recognized across podcast episodes using AI voice matching.
Appearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
So in other words, Alito is saying that basically exposure is coercion for little kids. Like when they're that young, you can't really distinguish. Right.
So in other words, Alito is saying that basically exposure is coercion for little kids. Like when they're that young, you can't really distinguish. Right.
Like, where does it end?
Like, where does it end?
So how does the lawyer for the parents respond to this idea that basically this case would open up the floodgates to a bunch of objections that schools would basically find unmanageable?
So how does the lawyer for the parents respond to this idea that basically this case would open up the floodgates to a bunch of objections that schools would basically find unmanageable?
So, Adam, what happens in the second half of these arguments?
So, Adam, what happens in the second half of these arguments?
And what questions do the justices have about that argument?
And what questions do the justices have about that argument?
Why is it so hard for them to define exactly what the line is?
Why is it so hard for them to define exactly what the line is?
Right, because basically if they allowed the parents to prevail in this case, then maybe some other parent is going to say, I don't want my kid reading Harry Potter. I don't want my kid learning about Halloween. And it's all based on religious grounds.
Right, because basically if they allowed the parents to prevail in this case, then maybe some other parent is going to say, I don't want my kid reading Harry Potter. I don't want my kid learning about Halloween. And it's all based on religious grounds.
And what does the school district lawyers say about that?
And what does the school district lawyers say about that?
I remember that one.
I remember that one.
If the court finds the way that you suggest they will find in this case, what do you think that that will actually mean for American education?
If the court finds the way that you suggest they will find in this case, what do you think that that will actually mean for American education?