Rand Paul

But the only way that can exist is you've got to let them charge more, you know, so that niche market, you know, can still exist.

So it's the same with AI.

There probably will be some things that maybe AI could do it, but maybe you'd rather a human do it.

Um, even now with, with art, um, my wife, uh, Kelly has written a children's book and she's looking at art.

She looked at the AI and it was pretty darn good, but she really wanted an artist because she wanted something to be, uh, to have real meaning, you know, and to be something that people connect with, you know, for children's books.

A lot of it is connecting with the pictures.

My favorite Dilbert cartoon is this woman comes up to Dilbert and she says, I'm really worried about the robots.

I'm worried about automation and I'm worried my son won't get work because of the robots.

And Dilbert looks at her and he says, well, you know, I've met your son and he could be replaced by a hammer.

Always has been this fear, but we have to have innovation and get around it.

There will be, you know, technical jobs or other jobs.

I don't know.

I guess I'm an optimist just by nature, and technology historically has not destroyed jobs.

It's created jobs, and we're way better off.

You know, absent the Industrial Revolution, all those inventions, we'd still be living, 98% of us, on $2 a day.

That's one of the best things for AI.

AI will give you good information.

I saw a good cartoon yesterday.

It was an iceberg.

And the top of the iceberg was Minnesota fraud.