Rand Paul

Constant dollars, controlling for inflation.

We went from 98% to less than 10%.

AI is going to continue that, and maybe it's exponential.

But when you have more leisure time, you have time to think of other stuff to do.

We have time for our idle brains, which are pretty big, to come up with new ideas.

So I think it's not yet known what we will think of, what may pass as work.

Maybe art is work at some point, and everybody's an artist.

But maybe there also are people who like to – even now, there's automation –

And we can grow with pesticides and fertilizers and stuff, just an enormous amount of food.

And actually, that's been good for the most part in supplying more food for people.

But there are still people who have organic farms who don't use pesticides or any of this.

There are people who have cattle with no antibiotics and no vaccines, chickens.

And that's sort of labor intensive and not as cost effective.

But the only way that can exist is you've got to let them charge more, you know, so that niche market, you know, can still exist.

So it's the same with AI.

There probably will be some things that maybe AI could do it, but maybe you'd rather a human do it.

Um, even now with, with art, um, my wife, uh, Kelly has written a children's book and she's looking at art.

She looked at the AI and it was pretty darn good, but she really wanted an artist because she wanted something to be, uh, to have real meaning, you know, and to be something that people connect with, you know, for children's books.

A lot of it is connecting with the pictures.

My favorite Dilbert cartoon is this woman comes up to Dilbert and she says, I'm really worried about the robots.