Randall Carlson

When did this happen? I'm guessing that it's probably happening during consistent with the other, the great meltdown. Now there were at least two, I think maybe three, what are called meltwater pulses. Meltwater pulse 1A usually dated around 14,500 years ago. meltwater pulse 1B, which is dated to 11,600 years ago.

When did this happen? I'm guessing that it's probably happening during consistent with the other, the great meltdown. Now there were at least two, I think maybe three, what are called meltwater pulses. Meltwater pulse 1A usually dated around 14,500 years ago. meltwater pulse 1B, which is dated to 11,600 years ago.

When did this happen? I'm guessing that it's probably happening during consistent with the other, the great meltdown. Now there were at least two, I think maybe three, what are called meltwater pulses. Meltwater pulse 1A usually dated around 14,500 years ago. meltwater pulse 1B, which is dated to 11,600 years ago.

And I think there's a third evidence now emerging of a third meltwater pulse that precisely with the Younger Dryas, lower Younger Dryas boundary. There we go. Look at this. Meltwater pulse 1A, right? And then you've got Younger Dryas right there. Well, that's showing meltwater pulse 1A a little bit older than the Younger Dryas. But see, they've added a new one there, meltwater pulse 1B.

And I think there's a third evidence now emerging of a third meltwater pulse that precisely with the Younger Dryas, lower Younger Dryas boundary. There we go. Look at this. Meltwater pulse 1A, right? And then you've got Younger Dryas right there. Well, that's showing meltwater pulse 1A a little bit older than the Younger Dryas. But see, they've added a new one there, meltwater pulse 1B.

And I think there's a third evidence now emerging of a third meltwater pulse that precisely with the Younger Dryas, lower Younger Dryas boundary. There we go. Look at this. Meltwater pulse 1A, right? And then you've got Younger Dryas right there. Well, that's showing meltwater pulse 1A a little bit older than the Younger Dryas. But see, they've added a new one there, meltwater pulse 1B.

dash one a zero maybe but then you see melt water pulse one b up there um which is now dated at 11 600 which i find very coincidental um because 11 600 is the date 11,600 years ago, that's the date that you get if you read Timaeus and Critias by Plato, when Solon's journey to Egypt took place in 6,600 BC. And according to the story that the elder Egyptian priesthood related to Solon,

dash one a zero maybe but then you see melt water pulse one b up there um which is now dated at 11 600 which i find very coincidental um because 11 600 is the date 11,600 years ago, that's the date that you get if you read Timaeus and Critias by Plato, when Solon's journey to Egypt took place in 6,600 BC. And according to the story that the elder Egyptian priesthood related to Solon,

dash one a zero maybe but then you see melt water pulse one b up there um which is now dated at 11 600 which i find very coincidental um because 11 600 is the date 11,600 years ago, that's the date that you get if you read Timaeus and Critias by Plato, when Solon's journey to Egypt took place in 6,600 BC. And according to the story that the elder Egyptian priesthood related to Solon,

The destruction of Atlantis occurred 9,000 years before. So you do your math, you come up with 11,600 years. Was the destruction of Atlantis kind of coincidental that you had this massive meltwater pulse exactly dated to that. Now that would be, again, mainstream would just dismiss that as coincidence. And I'm not convinced that it's coincidence. Yep, I agree. Then that requires, you know.

The destruction of Atlantis occurred 9,000 years before. So you do your math, you come up with 11,600 years. Was the destruction of Atlantis kind of coincidental that you had this massive meltwater pulse exactly dated to that. Now that would be, again, mainstream would just dismiss that as coincidence. And I'm not convinced that it's coincidence. Yep, I agree. Then that requires, you know.

The destruction of Atlantis occurred 9,000 years before. So you do your math, you come up with 11,600 years. Was the destruction of Atlantis kind of coincidental that you had this massive meltwater pulse exactly dated to that. Now that would be, again, mainstream would just dismiss that as coincidence. And I'm not convinced that it's coincidence. Yep, I agree. Then that requires, you know.

reformulating our thinking. Because wait a second, wait a minute, you're going to say that some tradition could have been handed down for 9,000 years? Well, I don't know.

reformulating our thinking. Because wait a second, wait a minute, you're going to say that some tradition could have been handed down for 9,000 years? Well, I don't know.

reformulating our thinking. Because wait a second, wait a minute, you're going to say that some tradition could have been handed down for 9,000 years? Well, I don't know.

The Grumlins?

The Grumlins?

The Grumlins?

Sure.

Sure.