Reed Hastings

And the other is that people will produce more.

I'm sure it'll be a mix.

But efficiency often generates more growth.

I mean, we did the radiology example.

So it's sort of that at larger scale.

So the way we pay for it is more GDP growth.

Well, I think it's a great question.

Compare it to globalization.

Probably this is a room full of globalists who believe in the benefits of trade.

And yet, despite that that really did deliver in terms of the overall economy, there was enough dislocation and enough of the countries that our politics has been shifted.

So I think there probably will be things like that

because of AI, but at least it's not, again, it's not a mass layoff scenario, most likely.

It's much more likely that there's a growth response and that we also see significant GDP growth increased beyond what we typically see because of the productivity of AI.

I would say that's an emerging area.

I mean, I think this was likely to be a big political issue in the next couple cycles, because many Americans will be concerned about the world changing too fast and too much, and I think

It's up to our politicians to sort of understand that and channel it in some productive way.

There's leaders in the industry like Jeffrey Hinton that spends full time now on these, how do we keep humans at the center of the system?

So there definitely are emerging leaders in that way.

But again, it's a new area like nuclear energy

or other DNA for a long time was very controversial.