Rep. Anna Paulina Luna

I don't know about that.

No, no, no.

We need to – I think AI can be used in good senses.

Like, I can – and I ask Grok things a lot, and I will argue points.

But I think we need to work alongside it because there's this aspect of AI that removes the humanity.

Like, I don't think you can teach AI empathy.

And there's a certain aspect of humanity that needs to be kept involved in these decision-making processes.

For example, if you have a drone –

That's been targeted to, let's say, eliminate a terrorist at this grid location and it's functioning solely on AI.

Well, what's going to enable it to be able to pause on destruction of a location if there's children within it?

I mean, if it's a bot, it's not thinking.

Well, there are oversights and massive investigations, especially if it's in regards to civilian casualties.

I would say, based on the people that I've talked with and interacted, it's definitely happened in the past and it's definitely problematic.

However, people get in trouble for it.

I'd have to, I mean, I don't.

Well, and that's a problem, and that's where a lot of these people do.

You have LOAC, so there's massive investigations with the JAGs, et cetera, that get involved in these investigations.

Well, I think you can have an AI decision-making process, but where there is a human involved in that step process.

So, like, the human would be the final step in authority, so the AI would rank it.

And, like, granted, I'm not an AI programmer, but I am saying that I think that there's an interface where you can have humans involved in the final step.