Richard Dolan

They are establishment intel military people.

They're insiders, but they believe in some level of transparency and disclosure.

This is not a new thing.

You could go back to the 1950s, read some of the old books by like the American author Donald Kehoe.

He was a retired Marine Corps major who had a lot of friends in the military and in the Pentagon in the 50s and 60s.

And they would say the same thing to him.

It's like the secrecy on this is wrong or at least it's excessive and we need to get some of this information out.

There's always been that.

And so I think what we're seeing in the last decade, with a lot of help from the culture of the web, which did not exist in prior decades, is that some of these people have been able to get some documents released, some videos out, and they're kind of stirring the pot a little bit.

But at the same time, we are still seeing a tremendous amount of resistance on the other side of that bureaucracy that has no interest

in a genuine disclosure of any sort because it's way too disruptive.

And that's what you're looking at.

So the problem is that the side that's on defense, that is the secrecy group,

uh realizes that they have to give up some they have to give up some things some information because there's just too much attention being focused on this and there's too much congressional uh pressure and so they were forced into creating you know the um you know the arrow office and these other other uh you know aspects within the military that are at least in theory amenable to uh looking into uap so

That's them making a concession.

This is a battle that is going on behind the scenes and we the public get to see some of the results.

And one of those results is the series of White House releases of UFO UAP data.

I think that's really what we're looking at.

This is not the same thing as disclosure.

I would say it's a process