Roman Yampolsky

There is mental diseases where people don't have empathy, don't have this human quality of understanding suffering in ours.

There is mental diseases where people don't have empathy, don't have this human quality of understanding suffering in ours.

Again, I would like to assume that normal people never think like that. It's always some sort of psychopaths, but yeah.

Again, I would like to assume that normal people never think like that. It's always some sort of psychopaths, but yeah.

Again, I would like to assume that normal people never think like that. It's always some sort of psychopaths, but yeah.

They can certainly be more creative. They can understand human biology better, understand our molecular structure, genome. Again, a lot of times torture ends and the individual dies. That limit can be removed as well.

They can certainly be more creative. They can understand human biology better, understand our molecular structure, genome. Again, a lot of times torture ends and the individual dies. That limit can be removed as well.

They can certainly be more creative. They can understand human biology better, understand our molecular structure, genome. Again, a lot of times torture ends and the individual dies. That limit can be removed as well.

Right. We can definitely keep up for a while. I'm saying you cannot do it indefinitely. At some point, the cognitive gap is too big. The surface you have to defend is infinite. But attackers only need to find one exploit.

Right. We can definitely keep up for a while. I'm saying you cannot do it indefinitely. At some point, the cognitive gap is too big. The surface you have to defend is infinite. But attackers only need to find one exploit.

Right. We can definitely keep up for a while. I'm saying you cannot do it indefinitely. At some point, the cognitive gap is too big. The surface you have to defend is infinite. But attackers only need to find one exploit.

If we create general super intelligences, I don't see a good outcome long-term for humanity. The only way to win this game is not to play it.

If we create general super intelligences, I don't see a good outcome long-term for humanity. The only way to win this game is not to play it.

If we create general super intelligences, I don't see a good outcome long-term for humanity. The only way to win this game is not to play it.

I don't know for sure. The prediction markets right now are saying 2026 for AGI. I heard the same thing from CEO of Anthropic, DeepMind, so maybe we are two years away, which seems very soon given we don't have a working safety mechanism in place or even a prototype for one. And there are people trying to accelerate those timelines because they feel we're not getting there quick enough.

I don't know for sure. The prediction markets right now are saying 2026 for AGI. I heard the same thing from CEO of Anthropic, DeepMind, so maybe we are two years away, which seems very soon given we don't have a working safety mechanism in place or even a prototype for one. And there are people trying to accelerate those timelines because they feel we're not getting there quick enough.

I don't know for sure. The prediction markets right now are saying 2026 for AGI. I heard the same thing from CEO of Anthropic, DeepMind, so maybe we are two years away, which seems very soon given we don't have a working safety mechanism in place or even a prototype for one. And there are people trying to accelerate those timelines because they feel we're not getting there quick enough.

So the definitions we used to have, and people are modifying them a little bit lately. Artificial general intelligence was a system capable of performing in any domain a human could perform. So kind of you're creating this average artificial person. They can do cognitive labor, physical labor, where you can get another human to do it.

So the definitions we used to have, and people are modifying them a little bit lately. Artificial general intelligence was a system capable of performing in any domain a human could perform. So kind of you're creating this average artificial person. They can do cognitive labor, physical labor, where you can get another human to do it.

So the definitions we used to have, and people are modifying them a little bit lately. Artificial general intelligence was a system capable of performing in any domain a human could perform. So kind of you're creating this average artificial person. They can do cognitive labor, physical labor, where you can get another human to do it.