Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Pricing

Roman Yampolsky

๐Ÿ‘ค Person
771 total appearances

Appearances Over Time

Podcast Appearances

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

Superintelligence was defined as a system which is superior to all humans in all domains. Now people are starting to refer to AGI as if it's superintelligence. I made a post recently where I argued, for me at least, if you average out over all the common human tasks, those systems are already smarter than an average human. So under that definition, we have it.

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

Superintelligence was defined as a system which is superior to all humans in all domains. Now people are starting to refer to AGI as if it's superintelligence. I made a post recently where I argued, for me at least, if you average out over all the common human tasks, those systems are already smarter than an average human. So under that definition, we have it.

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

Superintelligence was defined as a system which is superior to all humans in all domains. Now people are starting to refer to AGI as if it's superintelligence. I made a post recently where I argued, for me at least, if you average out over all the common human tasks, those systems are already smarter than an average human. So under that definition, we have it.

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

Shane Lake has this definition of where you're trying to win in all domains. That's what intelligence is. Now, are they smarter than elite individuals in certain domains? Of course not. They're not there yet. But the progress is exponential.

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

Shane Lake has this definition of where you're trying to win in all domains. That's what intelligence is. Now, are they smarter than elite individuals in certain domains? Of course not. They're not there yet. But the progress is exponential.

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

Shane Lake has this definition of where you're trying to win in all domains. That's what intelligence is. Now, are they smarter than elite individuals in certain domains? Of course not. They're not there yet. But the progress is exponential.

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

That would be enough to bootstrap the whole process.

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

That would be enough to bootstrap the whole process.

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

That would be enough to bootstrap the whole process.

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

Human level is general in the domain of expertise of humans. We know how to do human things. I don't speak dog language. I should be able to pick it up if I'm a general intelligence. It's kind of inferior animal. I should be able to learn that skill, but I can't. A general intelligence, truly universal general intelligence, should be able to do things like that humans cannot do.

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

Human level is general in the domain of expertise of humans. We know how to do human things. I don't speak dog language. I should be able to pick it up if I'm a general intelligence. It's kind of inferior animal. I should be able to learn that skill, but I can't. A general intelligence, truly universal general intelligence, should be able to do things like that humans cannot do.

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

Human level is general in the domain of expertise of humans. We know how to do human things. I don't speak dog language. I should be able to pick it up if I'm a general intelligence. It's kind of inferior animal. I should be able to learn that skill, but I can't. A general intelligence, truly universal general intelligence, should be able to do things like that humans cannot do.

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

To solve pattern recognition problems of that type, to do other similar things outside of our domain of expertise, because it's just not the world we live in.

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

To solve pattern recognition problems of that type, to do other similar things outside of our domain of expertise, because it's just not the world we live in.

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

To solve pattern recognition problems of that type, to do other similar things outside of our domain of expertise, because it's just not the world we live in.

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

We know calculators are smarter than humans in that narrow domain of addition.

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

We know calculators are smarter than humans in that narrow domain of addition.

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

We know calculators are smarter than humans in that narrow domain of addition.

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

So when I think about it, I usually think human with a paper and a pencil, not human with internet and other AI helping.

Lex Fridman Podcast
#431 โ€“ Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI

So when I think about it, I usually think human with a paper and a pencil, not human with internet and other AI helping.