Saagar Enjeti

But he was asking her to basically get tougher.

And it looks like from all of the reporting that.

This had nothing to do with Epstein unless, you know, that's not a precipitating factor in this.

What Trump wanted from Pam Bondi was more prosecutions of his political enemies, basically.

And we should add, no tears for Pam Bondi, who brought the swamp into the Justice Department, not for the first time.

It's obviously very routine, but they oversaw this horrible, corrupt process at the FTC trial.

That was allowing mergers to go through cash being like exchanged and just yucking it up.

Now, not like back alley deals, but like typical lobbyist type exchanges, which, you know, again, Trump administration welcomes Gail Slater and says she's going to crack down on big tech.

And then Pam Bondi and Todd Blanche and Chad Mazzella and others say, sorry, swamps more powerful here.

Basically, Pam Bondi came in.

Pam Bondi was a lobbyist.

She was a pretty successful lobbyist.

So perhaps that's where she's going back to.

She made the situation 200 times worse in her efforts to like circle the wagons around the president and protect him, which is extra pathetic.

Now, I'm reading from the Federalist right now.

Obviously, I used to work there.

The Federalist is like the if you're if you're looking for coverage on the right of like where they would be looking to

to see or looking for the right's perspective on the kind of retribution, the legal retribution in the Trump administration, this would be the place.

And just to characterize some of the conservative backlash to Pam Bondi, they're basically saying the coverage here from Matt Kittle, who's interviewing Mike Howell of the Oversight Project, which I think is connected to the Heritage Foundation.

But they're looking for a, quote, vicious operator.