Satya Shah

And I think that's the...

that's where a lot of the skepticism comes from.

So no matter what the Canucks do, it kind of gets, gets turned into like, Oh, I can't believe they're doing it this way.

I can't believe they're doing that.

And I can't blame people for being skeptical and pessimistic, but it just feels like whatever the Canucks do, people are not convinced.

Yeah, I'm completely with you.

And that's why, and I'm not saying I don't want to see an inexperienced candidate because I think those guys can have a lot of success.

But we do know it's very difficult to ask somebody that has never been a GM, not only to be the GM, but also be the quote-unquote hockey czar who's going to be handling the business side of things and also managing up towards ownership.

To me, it takes a level of skill and experience to be able to do that side of things.

And

And I'm not saying this is going to happen, but if you're not hiring two people, which is still a possibility, I think a lot of things are still possible here, is that at least if you go with an experienced person, that person can then in three months, four months, five months or whatever, to also take on the duties of the president role or whatever.

And then that person can bring in...

whoever they feel is going to be their coworker or right-hand man, you want to call them the GM, um, the person who does most of the hockey stuff that would make more sense.

Cause there would be more unification, but even so, like, I am so curious to see how they sequence all this stuff out.

Cause what we don't want to see is bring in an inexperienced person.

And then two months later, hire somebody above that person to be the president again.

And it's just like, you got to make sure that we're going to be on the same page.

Yeah.

Well, I hear you and I think you're bang on on all that stuff.

Completely agree.