Savon

You know what I mean?

I don't think either person should get 37.

The dad shouldn't get 37 because he made a mistake.

The kid shouldn't get 37 because the kid don't know how to drive and your dad put you in a car.

It goes a long way.

There's some more information.

But to me, not for the dad.

Not for the pop.

That's never been... Well, that's why he's saying if, right?

I said if.

Do you know the whereabouts of those friends currently?

Also, dad claims...

I mean, just to tie this part up, implied consent, as I understand it, is typically like, if I have a licensed driver in the house, the idea is, like you just said, you're a licensed driver, you drive the car in this house, and so if you drive it every day of the week, I didn't have to tell you this day, but he's not licensed.

You know what I mean?

And if you're drunk, I certainly wouldn't say that you're allowed to drive drunk.

So it gets tricky.

For me...

At the end of the day, nobody to me should get 37 years for this.

You know what I mean?

It just seems like an awful thing to happen.