Scott Adams

It doesn't just take a nuance away, it actually reverses it.

So, for example, some Rupars were the fine people hoax.

If you take away the part where he says, immediately after he said fine people, he said, I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis, they should be condemned completely.

If you remove that, which they did,

It reverses the meaning from disavowing Nazis, which he said explicitly, to complimenting them and supporting Nazis.

It's a complete reversal by removing one part.

Likewise, with the drinking bleach oaks, when they remove the part before he talks about it and immediately after, those are the two clarifications.

The clarifications were that he was talking about light being brought into the lungs, literally putting a stent down there or something and shining light on the lungs as a possible disinfectant.

The news removed the reference of light on both ends and he made sure he put it on both ends so you wouldn't be confused.

So they removed it and reported it and that changed it to he wants you to drink bleach.

Now drinking bleach is not even similar in any way to shining light down your

down your lungs.

Now, I'm watching some people who are finding this out for the first time.

Imagine you're watching this live stream right now, and you're hearing this for the first time.

And I just saw somebody go, LOL.

Sorry.

This is really mind-bending if you haven't heard it before.

Here's another one.

The overfeeding the koi, the fish, in Japan.

So the real video showed he was with, I guess it was President Abe, or one of the presidents, I forget who it was.