Scott Eicher

It's usually against the primary victim.

In this case, if she had a stalker, it would be Savannah.

If we had information, concrete information about a stalker, I'm sure we would have heard about it by now.

Well, I agree with just Scott Morgan.

This is definitely a pool of blood that looks like it was spit out or, you know, sneezed out.

What I also see is not only some of the rocks, is parts of that bush or the branch that is still at the front of the door there, and that's stuck in some of the blood droplets there.

So, you know, we know that all kind of occurred around the same time.

He goes to the front door,

He gets the branch.

How he got her out through that security door, we don't know.

But it appears to me that that's happening all at the same time.

That's why some of that branch is stuck into the blood area.

I totally agree.

And that last point you made that it needs to be immediate after the kidnapping and directly to the family, I think are some of the most important parts of it.

I mean, proof of life, that's obviously something that Savannah initially wanted.

But if you remember in some of the later videos, she was just kind of more leaning towards, hey, we want our mom back, whatever condition she's in.

Either way, I think the law enforcement, the FBI, and the sheriff's office evaluated those with the behavioral analysis unit, analyzing the wording, analyzing whether it's real or not.

And I don't think any of it was real.

I don't think the ransom was paid, and that's why we still are in this type of situation and have nothing to go on at this point.

It's very helpful to have people that are experts in each individual field.