Scott Horton

You're thinking of like the big photo op with all the folders of documents behind them.

Is that not all about the uranium tetrafluoride and the warhead that David Albright debunked and all the same claims that were in the smoking laptop from the Bush years?

Now, this would have been before Natanz was even dug and before single centrifuge was spinning, right?

I'm just making sure everybody understands.

My understanding is that there's nothing significant in the 2018 archive that was not already in the debunked claims from the laptop.

Yeah, because the CIA admitted that there was no laptop.

And Ali Heinen admitted that he got it from the MEK.

He got it from the MEK.

And where did the MEK get it?

The MEK got it from the Israelis.

I don't know the truth behind those documents.

I don't believe Israeli claims of what they were and where they came from without, for example, reading Albright's book and seeing what he has to say about all of that.

I don't take Netanyahu's claims.

Okay, so what's so significant in there?

You say that there's a document that has a plan to make five bombs, but isn't the rest of the proof the same?

Green salt experiments and the warhead for the missile that David Albright showed was...

Obviously fake, because the warhead was purportedly being designed for a missile that was now going to have an entirely different nose cone on it.

No, so David Albright, again, you know, we should bring David Albright here.

No, no, no.

The conclusion of which was they were researching it.