Scott Horton

Right before 2003.

They had no nuclear material to introduce into a single machine, right?

Active programming.

No, they hadn't.

Natanz was empty until the end of 2006, right?

They didn't even start spinning centrifuges in there until 2006.

and overthrew Saddam Hussein for them, that was when they gave up even considering the need for it.

Remember, the Iranians held a million-man vigil for the Americans on September 11th.

The Iranians hated the Taliban.

In fact, the Americans thought Iran might invade Afghanistan earlier in 2001, and they hated Saddam Hussein.

So they had every reason in the world to want to work with the United States after September 11th.

I already told you I don't take their word for anything.

And as far as I understand, the accusations in there are the same ones from the laptop that are already discredited.

And I haven't read David Albright's book.

You're distracting from me refuting this giant list of false claims that you made previously.

Yeah, God changed his mind after the neoconservatives lied America into war with Iraq for Ariel Sharon.

Well, I can tell you that... So Gareth's book came out in 2014, which is before this archive was supposedly revealed in Tehran.

But in Gareth's book, he shows that the CIA and National Intelligence Estimate of 2007 that said that there was a program before 2003 and was halted after America invaded Iraq was...

based on, one, the DIA's mistaken but sincere interpretation of these invoices for these dual-use technologies, and then the smoking laptop, which was completely fake and funneled into the stream by the Mujahideen e-cult, communist terrorist cult, the same people who've come off with, you know, 10 major hoaxes at NCRI.

They just put out...