Scott Horton

The Wall Street Journal says that U.S.

intelligence does not believe that Tehran ordered that attack.

And they'll say that America backs Israel.

So anything Israel does is America's responsibility, too, under that same logic, right?

That's all tiny technical violations.

None of that has anything to do with weaponization.

It's always, oh, yeah, how do you explain this isotope?

And they go, well, it must have came with the Pakistani junk that we bought from Akikon.

And then later that's verified.

And they go, yeah, well, we want to inspect this.

Let us.

And they go, no.

And then they do a year later and then they find nothing.

Yeah, that's just not.

That's the entire history of the IAEA's objections to Iran.

They won't answer this, and then later they do.

They won't answer that, and then later they do.

They abided by the additional protocol without having ratified it.

They abided by it for three years and did not proceed with any enrichment at all, as long as they were dealing in good faith with the EU, until W. Bush ruined those negotiations and closed them down.

Only then did they begin to install the centrifuges at Natanz.