Sean Kent

I'm taking this now in the lens because we've also already had the expert testify. And so to me, it was clear that the purpose of Cassie's best friend was to go for the expert. And you watched the expert testimony. The assumption is that the expert was going to testify to the fact that when people are finding themselves in these situations, they start to isolate.

And so the purpose of putting her best friend was in there is to show that this was isolation, that she hasn't talked to her anymore, that she has isolated herself from friends. What checks off some of the stuff the expert is saying.

And so the purpose of putting her best friend was in there is to show that this was isolation, that she hasn't talked to her anymore, that she has isolated herself from friends. What checks off some of the stuff the expert is saying.

And so the purpose of putting her best friend was in there is to show that this was isolation, that she hasn't talked to her anymore, that she has isolated herself from friends. What checks off some of the stuff the expert is saying.

She doesn't like Cassie, doesn't talk to her, not a friend of hers whatsoever. Those to me are always the most credible witnesses. She made it clear. I don't want to be here. I'm not friends with her. The government has subpoenaed me to make me be here. And I'm still telling you my truth. I still watch the abuse. That guy over there is not a good person.

She doesn't like Cassie, doesn't talk to her, not a friend of hers whatsoever. Those to me are always the most credible witnesses. She made it clear. I don't want to be here. I'm not friends with her. The government has subpoenaed me to make me be here. And I'm still telling you my truth. I still watch the abuse. That guy over there is not a good person.

She doesn't like Cassie, doesn't talk to her, not a friend of hers whatsoever. Those to me are always the most credible witnesses. She made it clear. I don't want to be here. I'm not friends with her. The government has subpoenaed me to make me be here. And I'm still telling you my truth. I still watch the abuse. That guy over there is not a good person.

You absolutely do. There's an unwritten rule. Happy jurors don't convict. And so what you want to try to do is you always want to make a witness your own witness. You want to make a witness on your side. And so if the person is giving you the information, you don't attack them because you don't have to. And you usually try to make that choice.

You absolutely do. There's an unwritten rule. Happy jurors don't convict. And so what you want to try to do is you always want to make a witness your own witness. You want to make a witness on your side. And so if the person is giving you the information, you don't attack them because you don't have to. And you usually try to make that choice.

You absolutely do. There's an unwritten rule. Happy jurors don't convict. And so what you want to try to do is you always want to make a witness your own witness. You want to make a witness on your side. And so if the person is giving you the information, you don't attack them because you don't have to. And you usually try to make that choice.

Most good lawyers and Diddy's team is filled with great lawyers. They make that choice during direct testimony, how this person is acting when they're talking to the United States. And so the assumption is when Mark was watching her testify, he knew she will give me information without being combative, so I will be nice to her.

Most good lawyers and Diddy's team is filled with great lawyers. They make that choice during direct testimony, how this person is acting when they're talking to the United States. And so the assumption is when Mark was watching her testify, he knew she will give me information without being combative, so I will be nice to her.

Most good lawyers and Diddy's team is filled with great lawyers. They make that choice during direct testimony, how this person is acting when they're talking to the United States. And so the assumption is when Mark was watching her testify, he knew she will give me information without being combative, so I will be nice to her.

And the opposite, he probably saw that this witness, and maybe they have talked, maybe they have seen his interviews, and they said, this witness will not be good to me, so I need to go after him. There is an art to cross-examination to make sure you get your point across. And we don't know because all the defense attorneys know the smoking gun that the federal government has.

And the opposite, he probably saw that this witness, and maybe they have talked, maybe they have seen his interviews, and they said, this witness will not be good to me, so I need to go after him. There is an art to cross-examination to make sure you get your point across. And we don't know because all the defense attorneys know the smoking gun that the federal government has.

And the opposite, he probably saw that this witness, and maybe they have talked, maybe they have seen his interviews, and they said, this witness will not be good to me, so I need to go after him. There is an art to cross-examination to make sure you get your point across. And we don't know because all the defense attorneys know the smoking gun that the federal government has.

And so maybe there is a reason that they're saying something else is coming out and that's the witness I need to go after.

And so maybe there is a reason that they're saying something else is coming out and that's the witness I need to go after.

And so maybe there is a reason that they're saying something else is coming out and that's the witness I need to go after.

It sounds Rico-like if you want to be technical. Racketeer-influenced corrupt organization is the way that I look at it, that they're helping the United States prove that this is a corrupt organization. The federal government has made it clear the purpose of this organization was to help Diddy with his commercial sex acts. That is the overreaching purpose, if you will, of this organization.