Sean Kent

Well, after a while, you start realizing and there's a little phrase that prosecutors are using that they'll say the devil doesn't hang out with angels. The devil hangs out with devil, that angel. Like, so in other words, these are bad people. So they're going to hang out with other bad people. The defense's standpoint is going to be you cannot trust anything that these folks are saying.

They're drug dealers. They're drug users. They don't have credibility. And so if her credibility is slightly shot from the defense standpoint, it's like you cannot trust her.

They're drug dealers. They're drug users. They don't have credibility. And so if her credibility is slightly shot from the defense standpoint, it's like you cannot trust her.

They're drug dealers. They're drug users. They don't have credibility. And so if her credibility is slightly shot from the defense standpoint, it's like you cannot trust her.

I don't know if you saw the filing that came out. The government now wants to recall their expert. They want to recall the doctor as a result of the cross-examination that happened on Mia.

I don't know if you saw the filing that came out. The government now wants to recall their expert. They want to recall the doctor as a result of the cross-examination that happened on Mia.

I don't know if you saw the filing that came out. The government now wants to recall their expert. They want to recall the doctor as a result of the cross-examination that happened on Mia.

Remember the text messages that came out, the R. Kelly information that came out, all of this stuff that came out about Mia and the fact that the defense is trying to make it seem like she liked him, she enjoyed him, she put stuff about his social media out. Well, they want to call that same expert to explain coercive control.

Remember the text messages that came out, the R. Kelly information that came out, all of this stuff that came out about Mia and the fact that the defense is trying to make it seem like she liked him, she enjoyed him, she put stuff about his social media out. Well, they want to call that same expert to explain coercive control.

Remember the text messages that came out, the R. Kelly information that came out, all of this stuff that came out about Mia and the fact that the defense is trying to make it seem like she liked him, she enjoyed him, she put stuff about his social media out. Well, they want to call that same expert to explain coercive control.

They sent a filing to the court and said, we want to recall her and explain that this is the reason why she testified this way. And this is the reason why she still loves Puffy and didn't realize it till later, because this is the cycle of abuse that we were talking about, Cassie. And it also has an effect on Mia.

They sent a filing to the court and said, we want to recall her and explain that this is the reason why she testified this way. And this is the reason why she still loves Puffy and didn't realize it till later, because this is the cycle of abuse that we were talking about, Cassie. And it also has an effect on Mia.

They sent a filing to the court and said, we want to recall her and explain that this is the reason why she testified this way. And this is the reason why she still loves Puffy and didn't realize it till later, because this is the cycle of abuse that we were talking about, Cassie. And it also has an effect on Mia.

So that's what I thought was interesting is that it's pretty clear that the government is filing this motion because they thought the cross-examination of Mia must have gone well for the defense. And now they want to recall the expert to basically rehabilitate their witness and say this is why she was sending all these loving, adoring text messages back and forth.

So that's what I thought was interesting is that it's pretty clear that the government is filing this motion because they thought the cross-examination of Mia must have gone well for the defense. And now they want to recall the expert to basically rehabilitate their witness and say this is why she was sending all these loving, adoring text messages back and forth.

So that's what I thought was interesting is that it's pretty clear that the government is filing this motion because they thought the cross-examination of Mia must have gone well for the defense. And now they want to recall the expert to basically rehabilitate their witness and say this is why she was sending all these loving, adoring text messages back and forth.

And it's a fascinating legal reason. And let me tell you why. And this is fascinating. When you go back and look in the indictment, I have finally been able to understand what the government is doing. And the classic sense of the word in the federal parlance, it is not bribery. Why? Generally in bribery in the federal rule, we deal with what with public officials, governors, mayors.

And it's a fascinating legal reason. And let me tell you why. And this is fascinating. When you go back and look in the indictment, I have finally been able to understand what the government is doing. And the classic sense of the word in the federal parlance, it is not bribery. Why? Generally in bribery in the federal rule, we deal with what with public officials, governors, mayors.

And it's a fascinating legal reason. And let me tell you why. And this is fascinating. When you go back and look in the indictment, I have finally been able to understand what the government is doing. And the classic sense of the word in the federal parlance, it is not bribery. Why? Generally in bribery in the federal rule, we deal with what with public officials, governors, mayors.

Cops usually have somebody who has been bought off to do something in an official act. You go to somebody, you say, I want you to vote for this bill. I want you to pass this legislation. That's bribery generally in the federal sense. It is a predicate act and it's one of the predicate acts that they need to do.