Sean Kent

I did the same thing you said. When you said, hey, we're going to talk about the Will Smith lawsuit, I'm just like, oh, I wonder what Will Smith did to somebody. And then you read it and you're waiting for the bombshell allegation and it doesn't come through it. And just as a reminder, you know, I told you at the beginning of the program, Will Smith's lawyer has issued a statement. He says Mr. Joseph's allegations.

I don't think this lawsuit will ever see a trial. You are a betting man because you take your folks to Las Vegas at Christmas and you all play the slot machine. I am not a betting man. Yes, I am. But if I were a betting man, I would bet that this lawsuit never sees a trial. How much?

In pounds or dollars? In pounds. Dollars. In pounds. Give me the watch. I'll take your watch. If you're wrong, I'll take your watch. If I'm wrong, I'm saying it now. If I am wrong, Anushka, my Cartier limited edition Santos watch is yours. Okay, stop flexing.

Sean, ennen kuin menetetään, olet saanut minulle vielä yhden Bar-kysymyksen. Tuntuu hieman... Tuntuu hieman rauhassa ja hieman rauhassa, mutta menen siitä. Yksi mies ja nainen olivat keskustelleet järjestelmässä järjestelmällä. Järjestelmässä, mies otti rauhan ja laittoi sen naiselle, haluamassa saavuttaa häntä.

The woman who was facing away from the man did not see or hear the rock coming. The rock missed the woman but struck a tree nearby. The man has been charged with criminal assault. Is the man guilty of criminal assault? A. No, because the woman was not aware of the imminent harmful or offensive conduct.

B. No, because there was no actual physical conduct with the woman. C. Yes, because the man attempted to commit a battery. D. Yes, because the man intended with the intent to cause fear out of imminent bodily harm. By the way, that's what makes the bar so incredibly complicated, because I guarantee you can think every answer could be right. I think it's D.

Se oli sinun ensimmäinen väärä yksi. Mutta se oli yksityiskriittinen, koska sinulla oli oikea vastaus. Sinulla oli vain D eikä C. Minusta tämä ei tuntuu hyvältä. Minä en halua olla barissa enää. Minä en halua tehdä tätä enää. Minä haluan mennä takaisin julkaisuun.

Well, I guarantee you they didn't know it. And we've interviewed a lot of people get on a stand, you freeze. Like if you remember the witness before her, Mia, I mean, remember they said they met with her 27 times. And they probably met with her 27 times to make sure they knew how she was going to be.

Well, I guarantee you they didn't know it. And we've interviewed a lot of people get on a stand, you freeze. Like if you remember the witness before her, Mia, I mean, remember they said they met with her 27 times. And they probably met with her 27 times to make sure they knew how she was going to be.

Well, I guarantee you they didn't know it. And we've interviewed a lot of people get on a stand, you freeze. Like if you remember the witness before her, Mia, I mean, remember they said they met with her 27 times. And they probably met with her 27 times to make sure they knew how she was going to be.

Because you think you can prep a witness for a stand, but until you get on the stand and you're looking at the person, you freeze. It's sort of like an actor getting stage fright. It's the exact same theory. And you never know what someone's going to do until they testify. So that's probably what happened. But I read that the cross-examination went well.

Because you think you can prep a witness for a stand, but until you get on the stand and you're looking at the person, you freeze. It's sort of like an actor getting stage fright. It's the exact same theory. And you never know what someone's going to do until they testify. So that's probably what happened. But I read that the cross-examination went well.

Because you think you can prep a witness for a stand, but until you get on the stand and you're looking at the person, you freeze. It's sort of like an actor getting stage fright. It's the exact same theory. And you never know what someone's going to do until they testify. So that's probably what happened. But I read that the cross-examination went well.

Not even that the cross-examination went so well that the witness did so poorly. And one bad witness, I've told you, can hurt your entire case.

Not even that the cross-examination went so well that the witness did so poorly. And one bad witness, I've told you, can hurt your entire case.

Not even that the cross-examination went so well that the witness did so poorly. And one bad witness, I've told you, can hurt your entire case.

And that's such a big defense. You know how many times I've called it the eight mile defense? Tell everybody the bad stuff about the witness before you let the cross examination happen. You get the bad out. Do you have a criminal record? Have you been in trouble with these things? Tell me, do you do drugs?

And that's such a big defense. You know how many times I've called it the eight mile defense? Tell everybody the bad stuff about the witness before you let the cross examination happen. You get the bad out. Do you have a criminal record? Have you been in trouble with these things? Tell me, do you do drugs?

And that's such a big defense. You know how many times I've called it the eight mile defense? Tell everybody the bad stuff about the witness before you let the cross examination happen. You get the bad out. Do you have a criminal record? Have you been in trouble with these things? Tell me, do you do drugs?

You get all that out because it doesn't have the same shock value as it will when the witness is being cross examined. And that's the problem. But my gut reaction is they did not know anything. She was going to either they did not know she was going to do so poorly or they knew she was going to do so poorly.