Sean Kent

Either she didn't see anything, and she didn't see anything, guess what? That goes along with Mr. Combs' defense, or she saw something and didn't do anything, and then that hurts her credibility. That's why I was like, don't be so quick to assume that the prosecution's cadence is the greatest case in the world because the cross-examine of her is going to be withery.

Exactly.

Exactly.

Exactly.

And that was weird to me. You're not the only one asking that same question. I'm just like, uh, you already have this via discovery. You already have all of this evidence. So that was something that was wild to me also.

And that was weird to me. You're not the only one asking that same question. I'm just like, uh, you already have this via discovery. You already have all of this evidence. So that was something that was wild to me also.

And that was weird to me. You're not the only one asking that same question. I'm just like, uh, you already have this via discovery. You already have all of this evidence. So that was something that was wild to me also.

But a lot of times what we have in the federal system is what's called a protective order, which says we will give this evidence to the lawyers, but don't you dare share it or leave a copy. Specifically, don't leave a copy with the defendant. We don't want him to have a copy while he's incarcerated.

But a lot of times what we have in the federal system is what's called a protective order, which says we will give this evidence to the lawyers, but don't you dare share it or leave a copy. Specifically, don't leave a copy with the defendant. We don't want him to have a copy while he's incarcerated.

But a lot of times what we have in the federal system is what's called a protective order, which says we will give this evidence to the lawyers, but don't you dare share it or leave a copy. Specifically, don't leave a copy with the defendant. We don't want him to have a copy while he's incarcerated.

And so that might be really what they're saying is we need a tangible copy so we can give Mr. Combs so he can go through it line by line. I'm sorry, frame by frame and go through it in full detail. That's my assumption is that he is not allowed to have a copy because that's usually the protective order or judge rules on these high profile cases or almost all federal cases.

And so that might be really what they're saying is we need a tangible copy so we can give Mr. Combs so he can go through it line by line. I'm sorry, frame by frame and go through it in full detail. That's my assumption is that he is not allowed to have a copy because that's usually the protective order or judge rules on these high profile cases or almost all federal cases.

And so that might be really what they're saying is we need a tangible copy so we can give Mr. Combs so he can go through it line by line. I'm sorry, frame by frame and go through it in full detail. That's my assumption is that he is not allowed to have a copy because that's usually the protective order or judge rules on these high profile cases or almost all federal cases.

Protect any victims, any potential victims. That's usually why they do the protective order, not even to make it that specific. Federal judges are very scared of releasing evidence to protect victims. And that happens a lot, Doc.

Protect any victims, any potential victims. That's usually why they do the protective order, not even to make it that specific. Federal judges are very scared of releasing evidence to protect victims. And that happens a lot, Doc.

Protect any victims, any potential victims. That's usually why they do the protective order, not even to make it that specific. Federal judges are very scared of releasing evidence to protect victims. And that happens a lot, Doc.

And if you notice, they filed a letter and immediately the prosecution came back and was like, what the heck are you doing? The only reason they filed that letter was to prejudice the pool so that we're doing exactly what we're doing. Everybody on social media are talking about those tapes because clearly the court of public defending is against Diddy. It 100% is.

And if you notice, they filed a letter and immediately the prosecution came back and was like, what the heck are you doing? The only reason they filed that letter was to prejudice the pool so that we're doing exactly what we're doing. Everybody on social media are talking about those tapes because clearly the court of public defending is against Diddy. It 100% is.

And if you notice, they filed a letter and immediately the prosecution came back and was like, what the heck are you doing? The only reason they filed that letter was to prejudice the pool so that we're doing exactly what we're doing. Everybody on social media are talking about those tapes because clearly the court of public defending is against Diddy. It 100% is.

So that filed that letter, I believe, in hopes of prejudice. But the second they filed it, you saw completely what ended up happening. The prosecution came and filed a secondary letter and said, whoa, there's entirely too much information in here. Can't happen.