Sean Kent

You can only prepare somebody so much for the fact that, ma'am, according to this, you are with this monster and presumably you are also a criminal. Because if what the government is alleging is true, if Mr. Combs has engaged in this abhorrent behavior and you were by his side, who did you call? What law enforcement did you contact? What person did you warn? So she's got two options.

You can only prepare somebody so much for the fact that, ma'am, according to this, you are with this monster and presumably you are also a criminal. Because if what the government is alleging is true, if Mr. Combs has engaged in this abhorrent behavior and you were by his side, who did you call? What law enforcement did you contact? What person did you warn? So she's got two options.

Either she didn't see anything, and she didn't see anything, guess what? That goes along with Mr. Combs' defense, or she saw something and didn't do anything, and then that hurts her credibility. That's why I was like, don't be so quick to assume that the prosecution's cadence is the greatest case in the world because the cross-examine of her is going to be withery.

Either she didn't see anything, and she didn't see anything, guess what? That goes along with Mr. Combs' defense, or she saw something and didn't do anything, and then that hurts her credibility. That's why I was like, don't be so quick to assume that the prosecution's cadence is the greatest case in the world because the cross-examine of her is going to be withery.

Either she didn't see anything, and she didn't see anything, guess what? That goes along with Mr. Combs' defense, or she saw something and didn't do anything, and then that hurts her credibility. That's why I was like, don't be so quick to assume that the prosecution's cadence is the greatest case in the world because the cross-examine of her is going to be withery.

Exactly.

Exactly.

Exactly.

And that was weird to me. You're not the only one asking that same question. I'm just like, uh, you already have this via discovery. You already have all of this evidence. So that was something that was wild to me also.

And that was weird to me. You're not the only one asking that same question. I'm just like, uh, you already have this via discovery. You already have all of this evidence. So that was something that was wild to me also.

And that was weird to me. You're not the only one asking that same question. I'm just like, uh, you already have this via discovery. You already have all of this evidence. So that was something that was wild to me also.

But a lot of times what we have in the federal system is what's called a protective order, which says we will give this evidence to the lawyers, but don't you dare share it or leave a copy. Specifically, don't leave a copy with the defendant. We don't want him to have a copy while he's incarcerated.

But a lot of times what we have in the federal system is what's called a protective order, which says we will give this evidence to the lawyers, but don't you dare share it or leave a copy. Specifically, don't leave a copy with the defendant. We don't want him to have a copy while he's incarcerated.

But a lot of times what we have in the federal system is what's called a protective order, which says we will give this evidence to the lawyers, but don't you dare share it or leave a copy. Specifically, don't leave a copy with the defendant. We don't want him to have a copy while he's incarcerated.

And so that might be really what they're saying is we need a tangible copy so we can give Mr. Combs so he can go through it line by line. I'm sorry, frame by frame and go through it in full detail. That's my assumption is that he is not allowed to have a copy because that's usually the protective order or judge rules on these high profile cases or almost all federal cases.

And so that might be really what they're saying is we need a tangible copy so we can give Mr. Combs so he can go through it line by line. I'm sorry, frame by frame and go through it in full detail. That's my assumption is that he is not allowed to have a copy because that's usually the protective order or judge rules on these high profile cases or almost all federal cases.

And so that might be really what they're saying is we need a tangible copy so we can give Mr. Combs so he can go through it line by line. I'm sorry, frame by frame and go through it in full detail. That's my assumption is that he is not allowed to have a copy because that's usually the protective order or judge rules on these high profile cases or almost all federal cases.

Protect any victims, any potential victims. That's usually why they do the protective order, not even to make it that specific. Federal judges are very scared of releasing evidence to protect victims. And that happens a lot, Doc.

Protect any victims, any potential victims. That's usually why they do the protective order, not even to make it that specific. Federal judges are very scared of releasing evidence to protect victims. And that happens a lot, Doc.

Protect any victims, any potential victims. That's usually why they do the protective order, not even to make it that specific. Federal judges are very scared of releasing evidence to protect victims. And that happens a lot, Doc.