Shashir Mehrotra

But it was a very small number for basically everybody.

The feature had very little usage.

It came right from the popular LLMs, so it's exactly the same experience you would have if you came to Claude or Gemini or ChatGPT and said, can you take this piece of writing, recommend the people who would be most useful to give feedback on it, take their most interesting works, and use that to try to give me feedback.

By the way, I think that's a really hard feature to make good for users.

And it's going to take work with people like you to actually deliver on that need.

I mean, we've certainly logged all the different interactions, yes.

It's not tagged that way, but we'll have to produce it, obviously, for a lawsuit.

What do the lawyers say?

I think it's actually quite clear.

I think it's a layman's test.

It's pretty obvious.

It's just not impersonation.

When you look at the feature, there's a disclosure next to every single link at the top and the bottom of the panel, very clearly stating these are inspired by these people.

It clearly states we have no relationship with these people.

That's the feature.

By the way, I'm not trying to defend it as a good feature.

I don't want to be on this line.

Maybe I could step back for a second and say, this is not the first time I've seen a situation like this.

I used to run the team at Google.

I used to run the YouTube team.