Shaun Kent

We have discussed the difference between our federal government and our state government, that our federal government in the United States, what they tend to do is investigate a charge for a long period of time and then arrest.

And that's why they make such better arrests.

A lot of times in the state system, they arrest and then investigate and get it wrong.

So I don't know what's happened in this situation, but I like the fact that if they're taking their time to do a proper investigation before arresting,

There are multiple ways to answer that question.

Probably the easiest way is to say that a good prosecutor will seek all of the charges that they think that they can get a conviction on.

that can only yield to more positive results?

They will do this because there are appeals.

There are processes when other things get thrown out.

There is potential that certain evidence will get thrown out.

And the goal is to get a conviction.

If you look at the Diddy trial, we always go back to the Diddy trial.

If you go back to the Diddy trial, everyone remembers that he was charged with a plethora of charges, a bunch of them.

And at the time, a lot of people were like, why is he charged with such a small charge?

But if you remember, he was found not guilty of a lot of charges and then found guilty of the prostitution charge that led him in jail.

So to go back to your question, it could be the same scenario.

charge him with everything.

And if for some reason, some of these other charges flips, at least we have a conviction on our better charge.

Realistically though, it will be difficult, if not impossible, given the fact that the young girl has passed, given what we have heard.

And of course, I don't know much of the evidence.