Shaun Kent

It's going to be very difficult to prove that he was engaged

make sure I say this, engaged in a sexual relationship with an underage minor, because that would be the proof.

There are multiple ways to answer that question.

Probably the easiest way is to say that a good prosecutor will seek all of the charges that they think that they can get a conviction on.

He can be friends with an underage minor, and that would be his defense and things of that nature.

But to prove that he is engaged in a sexual relationship with an underage minor would be difficult.

They will do this because there are appeals.

There are processes when other things get thrown out.

There is potential that certain evidence will get thrown out.

Third, to take all that, a good prosecutor possibly make this possibly because, again, David is still innocent until proven guilty.

And the goal is to get a conviction.

If you look at the Diddy trial, we always go back to the Diddy trial.

We haven't heard any facts.

I haven't looked at any of the evidence, anything.

If you go back to the Diddy trial, everyone remembers that he was charged with a plethora of charges, a bunch of them.

A good prosecutor possibly could utilize that as motive.

And at the time, a lot of people were like, why is he charged with such a small charge?

Possibly David's underage relationship with this child.

But if you remember, he was found not guilty of a lot of charges and then found guilty of the prostitution charge that led him in jail.

She is that a child.