Shaun Kent

could be the reason why the child lost their life.

So to go back to your question, it could be the same scenario.

And they could point to David.

And that's what prosecutors do a lot of times, that they might be looking for a motive.

charge him with everything.

And if for some reason, some of these other charges flips, at least we have a conviction on our better charge.

And that's a lot of times the hardest thing to prove on these cases.

And that might be why they're having all this family member go for the grand jury.

Realistically though, it will be difficult, if not impossible, given the fact that the young girl has passed, given what we have heard.

We need to figure out what the motivation is for why this possibly happened.

And that's sometimes why you meet with grand jury.

So

All of that goes to answer your question on would the relationship with the underage child be important to a prosecutor?

And of course, I don't know much of the evidence.

It's going to be very difficult to prove that he was engaged

make sure I say this, engaged in a sexual relationship with an underage minor, because that would be the proof.

And it could be important for a bevy of reasons.

He can be friends with an underage minor, and that would be his defense and things of that nature.

But to prove that he is engaged in a sexual relationship with an underage minor would be difficult.

Third, to take all that, a good prosecutor possibly, make this possibly, because again, David is still innocent until proven guilty.