Shawn Ryan

So some of the artifacts are that, which I guess is what it looks like.

But the funny thing, I think you literally know what it looks like.

And I don't think it would be that hard to do some sort of simulation of you're following a geodesic down and then there's a bunch of particles with you with some light.

It's just a question of how do you want to set up.

So a normal non-rotating butthole would have spherical symmetry.

A lot of buttholes are actually kind of rapidly spinning, so there is some asymmetry.

You can see it'll depend on where you are compared to this axis of rotation.

But there's not a front and back thing.

It's more like an axis of rotation difference.

It looks like those... Is it a ball?

I mean, sorry.

It looks like when those images of the black hole have this kind of funny distorted ball-looking thing.

No, that's... Yeah.

So you're seeing it.

It's like a surface of evolution around it, I think, is the rough picture.

The things are symmetric roughly around that.

But again, assuming that like... And I think there's no reason to assume otherwise that the light sources around it are kind of evenly spaced because this thing is rotating.

So there's a rotational symmetry, and you should do it that way.

Are there- I mean, I have no reason to think not.

I guess the question is like, what is, I'm like, sorry.