Shyam Sankar

I think the way I think about it is that we want to make any sort of kinetic or even non-kinetic economic action against Taiwan too risky for our counterparts in China. We want to push out. If the Davidson window ends at 27, our goal is to make that 28, then make it 29 and 30 and just keep making it harder and harder and too risky for the CCP to do anything. That's the optimality.

I think the way I think about it is that we want to make any sort of kinetic or even non-kinetic economic action against Taiwan too risky for our counterparts in China. We want to push out. If the Davidson window ends at 27, our goal is to make that 28, then make it 29 and 30 and just keep making it harder and harder and too risky for the CCP to do anything. That's the optimality.

That's the primacy of winning. It's a mindset that's like, we're not trying to solve the problem. We're trying to make sure they can't move on Taiwan. Could you be a little more descriptive on how would we do that? We have to make it not survivable or unpredictable of what the outcome is going to be.

That's the primacy of winning. It's a mindset that's like, we're not trying to solve the problem. We're trying to make sure they can't move on Taiwan. Could you be a little more descriptive on how would we do that? We have to make it not survivable or unpredictable of what the outcome is going to be.

That's the primacy of winning. It's a mindset that's like, we're not trying to solve the problem. We're trying to make sure they can't move on Taiwan. Could you be a little more descriptive on how would we do that? We have to make it not survivable or unpredictable of what the outcome is going to be.

And I think the way the CCP works, the amount of certainty they're going to need is pretty high for an operation. And if they know exactly what we're going to do, they're going to figure out a counter plan. They're the best at long-range planning. They have a 50-year plan, and it's actually really well thought through. They're good at that.

And I think the way the CCP works, the amount of certainty they're going to need is pretty high for an operation. And if they know exactly what we're going to do, they're going to figure out a counter plan. They're the best at long-range planning. They have a 50-year plan, and it's actually really well thought through. They're good at that.

And I think the way the CCP works, the amount of certainty they're going to need is pretty high for an operation. And if they know exactly what we're going to do, they're going to figure out a counter plan. They're the best at long-range planning. They have a 50-year plan, and it's actually really well thought through. They're good at that.

But I think the fundamental American strength, like why I think we'll win in the end, is that we're crazy. We don't know what we're going to do. When we get punched in the face, we don't even know what we're going to do. So how could they?

But I think the fundamental American strength, like why I think we'll win in the end, is that we're crazy. We don't know what we're going to do. When we get punched in the face, we don't even know what we're going to do. So how could they?

But I think the fundamental American strength, like why I think we'll win in the end, is that we're crazy. We don't know what we're going to do. When we get punched in the face, we don't even know what we're going to do. So how could they?

And so I think we have to kind of bring that craziness left of the balloon going up and make sure that the level of unpredictability that we're creating in that battle space means that we stay in competition and never get to crisis or conflict.

And so I think we have to kind of bring that craziness left of the balloon going up and make sure that the level of unpredictability that we're creating in that battle space means that we stay in competition and never get to crisis or conflict.

And so I think we have to kind of bring that craziness left of the balloon going up and make sure that the level of unpredictability that we're creating in that battle space means that we stay in competition and never get to crisis or conflict.

For the leading edge, very. And I think that's the important part of our head strategy. We have to, you know, I heard that Intel and TSMC are announcing a new joint venture. We need to bring, this is part of the broader need for reindustrializing the nation. You know, we are, we probably have two weeks of pharmaceutical supplies. Most of these pharmaceuticals are made in the upstream ingredients.

For the leading edge, very. And I think that's the important part of our head strategy. We have to, you know, I heard that Intel and TSMC are announcing a new joint venture. We need to bring, this is part of the broader need for reindustrializing the nation. You know, we are, we probably have two weeks of pharmaceutical supplies. Most of these pharmaceuticals are made in the upstream ingredients.

For the leading edge, very. And I think that's the important part of our head strategy. We have to, you know, I heard that Intel and TSMC are announcing a new joint venture. We need to bring, this is part of the broader need for reindustrializing the nation. You know, we are, we probably have two weeks of pharmaceutical supplies. Most of these pharmaceuticals are made in the upstream ingredients.

The APIs are made in China. If we just start going through the things we need to ensure our American prosperity, too many of them are in the hands of our lethal adversary.

The APIs are made in China. If we just start going through the things we need to ensure our American prosperity, too many of them are in the hands of our lethal adversary.

The APIs are made in China. If we just start going through the things we need to ensure our American prosperity, too many of them are in the hands of our lethal adversary.