SPEAKER_04

a question like this years ago.

We were stepping into an elevator and we were talking about his ideas about how these things might move.

And I said, so they're cheating somehow, aren't they?

And his answer was, from our point of view, they're cheating.

From their point of view, they're just using the physics that we don't understand yet.

So where's the energy coming from?

What are they doing?

And so that might be, as a for instance, a reason why you don't want everybody having access to it.

Because any one of those objects is worse than a thermonuclear bomb.

You shoot one of those things at a city and that's the end of the city.

And if anybody could do it, you know.

You can already imagine the negatives where people will say, oh, well, it's the it's the

It's the apocalyptic nanny state, right, where AI just basically takes care of you and humans devolve into something, which is why I think a merger of human intellect with this where it's a synergy as opposed to an either-or.

I don't want to be nanny stated either.

I want to use it to explore ideas or explore pleasure.

I mean, I'm finding people want to be hedonistic and participate in virtual parties all day long for all I care.

I don't care.

But I think giving people the option to do whatever it is that they want to do, it's the most liberal and conservative way of living because you're allowed to do what you want to do.

But we're not because we're living at the behest of so many other strictures.

Elements of truth with a healthy dose of misinformation that perhaps he was provided.