SPEAKER_04

pseudo-skeptic would dare approach it because they're just not smart enough.

But if you put out these snippets that don't have sufficient background, they can be picked apart by anybody.

But that's why peer review is so important.

And people mistake peer review as trying to get the reviewers to agree with your conclusions.

No, the main purpose of peer review is actually to make sure that the methods

that you used are sufficiently detailed and are correct enough to the extent you came to any conclusions, they match the methods that you used.

Did you ever see the Netflix show Chimp Empire?

Amazing, right?

Amazing.

20 million years of separation and it looked like fucking faculty meeting, you know, with people like looking at each other and planning and plotting, board meeting, you know.

And so we shared all of those interactions from 20 million years ago.

So how much further back would you have to go?

to have something like what that is.

I mean, it's clearly not recent.

Yeah, no, technology gives evolution the excuse to no longer make or allow for you to be robust.

Thank you.

That was the word I was looking for.

Right.

Yes.

Can you imagine the scenario of, I mean, these things we know are, the body is real.