Stuart Rhodes

We're not going to go against direct orders of the President of the United States as their commander-in-chief.

I think President Trump should follow Eisenhower's example exactly and do exactly the same thing.

Absolutely.

Same thing.

You have an open insurrection across the country.

I mean, look, they're burning down police precincts in Portland, Oregon.

They tried to burn down the federal courthouse with U.S.

Marshals inside.

Across the country, in Las Vegas, you had insurrectionists shooting at or trying to shoot at court security.

at federal courthouses and they were killed.

You had another attack on a federal courthouse where an officer was killed in California.

So across the country, you had direct violation of federal law, direct armed insurrection against federal law being enforced, and also terrorism against the American people.

So the Insurrection Act is very clear that whenever the president himself determines

I'll read it to you right here.

Section 332 of the Insurrection Act.

This is 10 U.S.

Code, Section 331-332.

Whenever the president considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any state by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings—that's what we have—

He may call into federal service such of the militia of any state and use such of the armed forces as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.

And Section 333 continues, interference with state and federal law.