Susan Glasser

you know, a tough negotiator wouldn't have done that.

So it seems like Saudi Arabia came here and got a lot more of what it wanted.

And it's not clear to me what the U.S.

got out of this, aside from possibly more side business deals that would benefit Trump's family or the family of some of his cabinet members.

Yeah, I think I think you're right to make sure that we talk about it because this is a signature moment in Donald Trump's campaign of revenge and retribution.

And that, I think, is a huge part of what he wants to do with the White House in his second term.

And the fact that he's got himself an FBI and a Justice Department, that he's reshaped in the mode of personal loyalty shock troops.

This case is going to be kind of one of the signature examples of that.

I was reading...

some of the filings in, in, in this case.

And it really, it is remarkable because the allegation, as I understand it in, in total lay person's terms here is that they had two different versions of the indictment of Comey and that it's possible that the magistrate judge misinterpreted when Lindsay Halligan brought us the second version of the indictment.

And it was presented by the grand jury foreperson that the,

It's possible the grand jury actually never saw the second indictment of Comey, which was entered under their name.

And that would be truly a remarkable thing if that is what happened.

So that's my understanding what's going on here.

And it does speak to the possibility of an enormous screw up by an inexperienced person who never would have passed muster for this job under any president, Democrat or Republican.

And that is a through line here.

Well,

Abuse of power is the kind of thing that should rattle people.

It has nothing to do with ideology.