Susan Glasser

I think they should go to court, number one, and I think they should all sign on to the lawsuit. And I imagine they will go to court, but I also imagine that they won't all sign on to the lawsuit. And, you know, I get it. I get it because it seems pretty clear that the goal is to have an actual trial.

what I'm calling a Kremlin press pool, as opposed to a real press pool by the end of the year, if not much, much sooner in the Trump White House. I think that, you know, is a part of their agenda that I definitely anticipate, offering Americans the facsimile and the appearance of Trump being surrounded by reporters when in fact they're not

what I'm calling a Kremlin press pool, as opposed to a real press pool by the end of the year, if not much, much sooner in the Trump White House. I think that, you know, is a part of their agenda that I definitely anticipate, offering Americans the facsimile and the appearance of Trump being surrounded by reporters when in fact they're not

what I'm calling a Kremlin press pool, as opposed to a real press pool by the end of the year, if not much, much sooner in the Trump White House. I think that, you know, is a part of their agenda that I definitely anticipate, offering Americans the facsimile and the appearance of Trump being surrounded by reporters when in fact they're not

you know, truly independent reporters, but handpicked for their loyalty to the regime. Certainly it would be very consistent with the playbook of authoritarianism that he's following in every other respect. So to me, this looks like an early testing, you know, probing fight. And by the way,

you know, truly independent reporters, but handpicked for their loyalty to the regime. Certainly it would be very consistent with the playbook of authoritarianism that he's following in every other respect. So to me, this looks like an early testing, you know, probing fight. And by the way,

you know, truly independent reporters, but handpicked for their loyalty to the regime. Certainly it would be very consistent with the playbook of authoritarianism that he's following in every other respect. So to me, this looks like an early testing, you know, probing fight. And by the way,

when somebody who's seeking to undermine democracy and our constitutional principles goes after such a straightforward one, where is the uproar? You know, I can't say tactically speaking what's the right course, but I can tell you that for me personally, This is a line that is crossed that is serious.

when somebody who's seeking to undermine democracy and our constitutional principles goes after such a straightforward one, where is the uproar? You know, I can't say tactically speaking what's the right course, but I can tell you that for me personally, This is a line that is crossed that is serious.

when somebody who's seeking to undermine democracy and our constitutional principles goes after such a straightforward one, where is the uproar? You know, I can't say tactically speaking what's the right course, but I can tell you that for me personally, This is a line that is crossed that is serious.

And I would say to all your listeners, it's no joke when the president of the United States is trying to put his emperor hat on and tell the Associated Press, the backbone of independent, neutral news in this country that goes out to all of the papers in all of middle America, when he attacks the backbone of our free press and says,

And I would say to all your listeners, it's no joke when the president of the United States is trying to put his emperor hat on and tell the Associated Press, the backbone of independent, neutral news in this country that goes out to all of the papers in all of middle America, when he attacks the backbone of our free press and says,

And I would say to all your listeners, it's no joke when the president of the United States is trying to put his emperor hat on and tell the Associated Press, the backbone of independent, neutral news in this country that goes out to all of the papers in all of middle America, when he attacks the backbone of our free press and says,

I am so all powerful that if you don't adopt my language and call the Gulf of Mexico, the Gulf of America, then I will ban you. That is literally what our first amendment was designed for. And yes, if you allow it to pass without complaining, then you are part of the problem. And I hope that the bulwark will stand up for the Associated Press.

I am so all powerful that if you don't adopt my language and call the Gulf of Mexico, the Gulf of America, then I will ban you. That is literally what our first amendment was designed for. And yes, if you allow it to pass without complaining, then you are part of the problem. And I hope that the bulwark will stand up for the Associated Press.

I am so all powerful that if you don't adopt my language and call the Gulf of Mexico, the Gulf of America, then I will ban you. That is literally what our first amendment was designed for. And yes, if you allow it to pass without complaining, then you are part of the problem. And I hope that the bulwark will stand up for the Associated Press.

And I hope that all of the people listening will too, because yes, it matters. Absolutely.

And I hope that all of the people listening will too, because yes, it matters. Absolutely.

And I hope that all of the people listening will too, because yes, it matters. Absolutely.

Yeah, no, that's right, Tim. And look, you know, the goal here is to overwhelm us with outrages such that we're kind of soporific and unable to respond effectively to any one of them. But, you know, I hated the post election, you know, kind of democratic chest beating and media chest beating over. Whoa, is us like, you know, we can't have a resistance this time because it wasn't effective. Right.