Susan Kokinda

I'm looking at this from the standpoint of what the British created in terms of political, radical Islam to use as a tool to keep the world divided.

So think, for example, the fall of the Soviet Union at the beginning of the 1990s.

All of a sudden, we no longer have the communist boogeyman from the standpoint of the Soviet Union as the way of dividing the world.

Samuel P. Huntington, who's, you know, an author who, you know, has got extensive ties to British institutions and British intelligence and so on.

What does he do?

He writes The Clash of Civilizations.

All right, now the dividing line in the world is the West versus Islam.

Now what Samuel P. Huntington isn't going to tell you is everything he's attacking is

in terms of Islam, which is dangerous, is this particularly created political radical Islam, which the British empire has its hands all over.

So that is the game that the British have played.

Now, Donald Trump, I think has judoed a lot

Because unlike the way the British approach, say, the Mideast, the way British intelligence played a major role in shaping the policies in Saudi Arabia, Qatar.

And again, in terms of the king, I mean, I think you have different levels in terms of

competence of monarchs.

I think Queen Elizabeth was extremely competent, extremely intelligent.

I'm not sure how far down Charles falls on that rating system, but I don't think he's quite at the level of his mother.

But that doesn't mean, you know, he doesn't have his hands in a lot of things.

But that's sort of been the role, the relationship between the British and these particular movements and tendencies in the Mideast.

But along comes Donald Trump.

And remember, his first administration, where he really didn't have control of a lot, which I think he discovered pretty quickly.