Terry Austin
đ€ SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Role in that movie. It was a Halloween movie. It was called Boo, a Madea Halloween. And he had a small role in that. So it's not quite the same as Derek Dixon, who had a more prolonged experience and employment with Tyler Perry. So I think it's going to be somewhat different. What we've seen so far from Mario Rodriguez is a series of
kirjoituksia, mutta kirjoitukset ovat erilaisia Dicksonista. Se on todella Rodriguez, joka menee esiin Tyler Perrylle ja hÀn sanoo, ettÀ katsokaa, olen todella kiinnostunut siitÀ, kuinka hyödyllinen olet ollut. Olen tehtÀvÀsi sinulle. Ja sitten on toinen jÀrjestelmÀ kirjoituksista, jossa hÀn sanoo, ettÀ katsokaa, olen taloudellisessa rauhallisuudessa. Ja taas nÀemme työnantajaa Tyler Perrylle sanoen,
Joten se ei toimi.
help the case that he has these text messages long after the fact where he's reaching out to Tyler Perry. So I think it's going to hurt the case that Rodriguez has brought. I think the jury is going to say this is kind of hard to believe that you never said anything about the harassment earlier.
It was intentional on the part of the defendant that Tyler Perry intentionally caused this emotional distress. And it has to be severe emotional distress and severe actions that were taken against the plaintiff. So it's not, well, I'm sorry, you yelled at me and now I'm really distressed.
You literally have to show that you went to a doctor, that you were treated, and these are the bills, and I had this diagnosis. So it's a very good claim for a plane to bring, but it is a claim that you have to substantiate.
Miksi hÀn sanoi, ettÀ hÀn on viimeisenÀ onnistunut toiseen asiaan Tyler Perryn vastaan? Se on mielenkiintoista, koska luulen, ettÀ Alec Spiro sopii tÀtÀ mediassa. HÀn yrittÀÀ nÀyttÀÀ, ettÀ Jonathan Deschamps on vahvistunut aiemmin. Teknologisesti se asia Perryn vastaan ei ollut vahvistunut. Luulen, ettÀ hÀn tarkoittaa sitÀ,
NÀmÀ ovat menettÀviÀ asioita. TÀmÀ tutkija tarkoittaa vain ihmisiÀ, jotka tukevat asioita Tyler Perryn vastaan. Mutta mielestÀni se, mitÀ Alex Biro yrittÀÀ tehdÀ, on sanoa, ettÀ tÀmÀ on huonoa. EttÀ sinulla on tutkija, joka yrittÀÀ tehdÀ rahaa Tyler Perryn vastaan. HÀn tarkoittaa tutkijoita. HÀnellÀ oli tutkija Derrick Dicksonilla.
and now he has a plaintiff with Mario Rodriguez. If anything else comes up, they're all going to be losing cases, and this is just a money grab. But technically, the Derek Dixon case is alive and thriving in Georgia, and the Mario Rodriguez case is now in California, and I think...
That was not what happened when they were in my studio. That is not what happened when they were in my home. I didn't do this. I didn't approach them. And he's going to try to explain those text messages in both cases. I think the Derek Dixon text messages are going to be a little more difficult. And I do think you might see a settlement in that case. The Mario Rodriguez case, those text messages don't seem...
niin kuin me tiedÀmme nyt, ettÀ Tyler Perry yrittÀÀ poistaa Rodriguesa johonkin tavalla tai yrittÀÀ kÀyttÀÀ hÀnen suunnitelmaansa seksuaalisiin hyökkÀyksiin Tyler Perrylle. MielestÀni tÀssÀ tapauksessa nÀmÀ molemmat voivat nÀyttÀÀ yhdessÀ toisistaan taitoja.
He could, but I think the judge would probably exclude that unless one of them was a witness physically to seeing what was going on. So the judge has to instruct the jury in these types of cases that you're going to make your decision what happened in this case based on the evidence brought in this case and based on the law in this case. So what might have happened before with Derek Dixon
technically isn't going to have an effect on the Mario Rodriguez case. Now, I mean, I expect from an evidentiary standpoint that the judge is going to say only consider what happened here. But if in fact Derek Dixon was in the same room or in the same studio that Rodriguez was in, that could be allowed. Obviously, if there are witnesses to the sexual harassment, they heard something, they saw something, they were involved in
LÀhtökohtaisesti yksi on vahvempi kuin toinen. Derrick Dixonin lainsÀÀdÀntö on hieman vahvempi kuin Mario Rajigas, koska hÀnellÀ on enemmÀn vÀitettÀ, suhteita ja tietoja. Mutta ajattelen, ettÀ Tyler Perry pitÀisi ottaa molemmat erityisesti.