Tom Homan

I agree with that. And Clarence Thomas had said during these hearings that the country got along just fine without nationwide injunctions until 1960. These are a relatively new phenomenon, and they've happened a lot more since Trump took office in 2016, 2017. And I think –

I agree with that. And Clarence Thomas had said during these hearings that the country got along just fine without nationwide injunctions until 1960. These are a relatively new phenomenon, and they've happened a lot more since Trump took office in 2016, 2017. And I think –

I agree with that. And Clarence Thomas had said during these hearings that the country got along just fine without nationwide injunctions until 1960. These are a relatively new phenomenon, and they've happened a lot more since Trump took office in 2016, 2017. And I think –

Some of the numbers on that is I think something like 75% of the national injunctions have been against Donald Trump just in the last 10 years. So this is a problem that has cropped up recently that is now being dealt with, and I agree with you. I think the way this has gone so far, it looks decent for Trump, but it probably is going to be pretty close.

Some of the numbers on that is I think something like 75% of the national injunctions have been against Donald Trump just in the last 10 years. So this is a problem that has cropped up recently that is now being dealt with, and I agree with you. I think the way this has gone so far, it looks decent for Trump, but it probably is going to be pretty close.

Some of the numbers on that is I think something like 75% of the national injunctions have been against Donald Trump just in the last 10 years. So this is a problem that has cropped up recently that is now being dealt with, and I agree with you. I think the way this has gone so far, it looks decent for Trump, but it probably is going to be pretty close.

General, when were the first universal injunctions used?

General, when were the first universal injunctions used?

General, when were the first universal injunctions used?

So we survived until the 1960s without universal injunctions.

So we survived until the 1960s without universal injunctions.

So we survived until the 1960s without universal injunctions.

Yeah, I think... What's interesting about this to me is also the fact that this is really very important for progressives because this is sort of one of the last levers they have left is these courts. They have no control in the Hill. You know, the party's in disarray. So they've really relied on the courts to sort of do their, do what they want. And as you pointed out, this is not just a Trump.

Yeah, I think... What's interesting about this to me is also the fact that this is really very important for progressives because this is sort of one of the last levers they have left is these courts. They have no control in the Hill. You know, the party's in disarray. So they've really relied on the courts to sort of do their, do what they want. And as you pointed out, this is not just a Trump.

Yeah, I think... What's interesting about this to me is also the fact that this is really very important for progressives because this is sort of one of the last levers they have left is these courts. They have no control in the Hill. You know, the party's in disarray. So they've really relied on the courts to sort of do their, do what they want. And as you pointed out, this is not just a Trump.

Trump isn't the first president, I'll put it this way, who doesn't like presidential, doesn't like these injunctions. So it's not just like this sort of, every executive doesn't like the fact that anybody messes with what they're trying to do, let alone sort of local courts. So, yeah. It is being framed narrowly, as you say, about this sort of what seems like a procedural question.

Trump isn't the first president, I'll put it this way, who doesn't like presidential, doesn't like these injunctions. So it's not just like this sort of, every executive doesn't like the fact that anybody messes with what they're trying to do, let alone sort of local courts. So, yeah. It is being framed narrowly, as you say, about this sort of what seems like a procedural question.

Trump isn't the first president, I'll put it this way, who doesn't like presidential, doesn't like these injunctions. So it's not just like this sort of, every executive doesn't like the fact that anybody messes with what they're trying to do, let alone sort of local courts. So, yeah. It is being framed narrowly, as you say, about this sort of what seems like a procedural question.

And it'll be interesting to see when they get to the substance of it, if they ever do get to the substance of it, how they rule. Because that's a constitutional case that I think would be a lot harder for the president to make.

And it'll be interesting to see when they get to the substance of it, if they ever do get to the substance of it, how they rule. Because that's a constitutional case that I think would be a lot harder for the president to make.