Travis Kitchens

You can't just say, I'm only listening to the people who say what I like. The other people, I'll ignore. Sure. What you have to believe in is a conspiracy amongst academia, which Graham Hancock and other people's push, which is absurd. There is no conspiracy.

You can't just say, I'm only listening to the people who say what I like. The other people, I'll ignore. Sure. What you have to believe in is a conspiracy amongst academia, which Graham Hancock and other people's push, which is absurd. There is no conspiracy.

Yeah, that was great. Hancock was demolished.

Yeah, that was great. Hancock was demolished.

Yeah, that was great. Hancock was demolished.

It doesn't matter because he was absolutely demolished. And Graham Hancock, if you look at the implications of it, what Hancock said is, I believe all this stuff, but I don't have any proof, but you don't have any proof that it's not true. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. The burden of proof is on the believer. I don't get to say, there's a teapot in the sky and it's there. Nobody else can see it.

It doesn't matter because he was absolutely demolished. And Graham Hancock, if you look at the implications of it, what Hancock said is, I believe all this stuff, but I don't have any proof, but you don't have any proof that it's not true. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. The burden of proof is on the believer. I don't get to say, there's a teapot in the sky and it's there. Nobody else can see it.

It doesn't matter because he was absolutely demolished. And Graham Hancock, if you look at the implications of it, what Hancock said is, I believe all this stuff, but I don't have any proof, but you don't have any proof that it's not true. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. The burden of proof is on the believer. I don't get to say, there's a teapot in the sky and it's there. Nobody else can see it.

You've got to prove me wrong. Not the way it works. If you make claims, you have to prove them. And Hancock can't prove anything he says because he made it up, because he's a fantasy writer. The books that Hancock writes are in a long tradition of Victorian literature of the same shit. UFOs mixed with mystery cults. He's building on Erich von Däniken. You know his stuff? I know Erich von Däniken.

You've got to prove me wrong. Not the way it works. If you make claims, you have to prove them. And Hancock can't prove anything he says because he made it up, because he's a fantasy writer. The books that Hancock writes are in a long tradition of Victorian literature of the same shit. UFOs mixed with mystery cults. He's building on Erich von Däniken. You know his stuff? I know Erich von Däniken.

You've got to prove me wrong. Not the way it works. If you make claims, you have to prove them. And Hancock can't prove anything he says because he made it up, because he's a fantasy writer. The books that Hancock writes are in a long tradition of Victorian literature of the same shit. UFOs mixed with mystery cults. He's building on Erich von Däniken. You know his stuff? I know Erich von Däniken.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

That doesn't make Hancock right. No, you're right.

That doesn't make Hancock right. No, you're right.

That doesn't make Hancock right. No, you're right.

No, but I don't know enough about these topics in order to say he got it wrong, but I totally believe that he was wrong probably on multiple things.

No, but I don't know enough about these topics in order to say he got it wrong, but I totally believe that he was wrong probably on multiple things.

No, but I don't know enough about these topics in order to say he got it wrong, but I totally believe that he was wrong probably on multiple things.