Travis Kitchens

Yeah, but you can trace the foundations on which these ideas were built. So the idea of rising and dying gods is from James George Frazier's book, The Golden Bow, which is a very... Very famous book. But when you look back at books like this, like The Golden Bow, a lot of it doesn't stand up to modern historical standards.

with Mando. The new James Frazier was Mircea Eliade, who was an extremely important person in all of this literature. So what you're talking about, the rising and dying gods.

with Mando. The new James Frazier was Mircea Eliade, who was an extremely important person in all of this literature. So what you're talking about, the rising and dying gods.

with Mando. The new James Frazier was Mircea Eliade, who was an extremely important person in all of this literature. So what you're talking about, the rising and dying gods.

Yeah, because he's drawing from this literature. He's drawing from the book you're talking about? Yes. You wouldn't have any of this stuff if it wasn't for Frazier's book. Everybody should go and buy it. It's very famous. The Golden Bow, B-O-U-G-H. And here's an interesting thing about it.

Yeah, because he's drawing from this literature. He's drawing from the book you're talking about? Yes. You wouldn't have any of this stuff if it wasn't for Frazier's book. Everybody should go and buy it. It's very famous. The Golden Bow, B-O-U-G-H. And here's an interesting thing about it.

Yeah, because he's drawing from this literature. He's drawing from the book you're talking about? Yes. You wouldn't have any of this stuff if it wasn't for Frazier's book. Everybody should go and buy it. It's very famous. The Golden Bow, B-O-U-G-H. And here's an interesting thing about it.

You can buy the Oxford edition now and there's a deleted chapter in it because when it came out, it caused a massive controversy. And the reason why is because there was a chapter that said, man, Jesus is just a generic dying and rying agricultural God. And people lost their minds within the academy. You know, you're still conservative Christianity.

You can buy the Oxford edition now and there's a deleted chapter in it because when it came out, it caused a massive controversy. And the reason why is because there was a chapter that said, man, Jesus is just a generic dying and rying agricultural God. And people lost their minds within the academy. You know, you're still conservative Christianity.

You can buy the Oxford edition now and there's a deleted chapter in it because when it came out, it caused a massive controversy. And the reason why is because there was a chapter that said, man, Jesus is just a generic dying and rying agricultural God. And people lost their minds within the academy. You know, you're still conservative Christianity.

Well, not really, but they became very mad and they deleted it. He agreed to have it deleted. But then you can buy editions now to where they put it back in. Yeah.

Well, not really, but they became very mad and they deleted it. He agreed to have it deleted. But then you can buy editions now to where they put it back in. Yeah.

Well, not really, but they became very mad and they deleted it. He agreed to have it deleted. But then you can buy editions now to where they put it back in. Yeah.

So what you have to do in order to make these structural comparisons, which you're talking about, well, this guy's kind of like this guy, this guy's kind of like this guy, is you have to take them out of their local context and saw off the edges of them to make it fit. So is there something to it? Probably. But...

So what you have to do in order to make these structural comparisons, which you're talking about, well, this guy's kind of like this guy, this guy's kind of like this guy, is you have to take them out of their local context and saw off the edges of them to make it fit. So is there something to it? Probably. But...

So what you have to do in order to make these structural comparisons, which you're talking about, well, this guy's kind of like this guy, this guy's kind of like this guy, is you have to take them out of their local context and saw off the edges of them to make it fit. So is there something to it? Probably. But...

Also, if you go back and look at where these ideas come from, you often find that these people have motivations to do it. You see what I'm saying? Yeah, but even Hillman and Ruck believe it, right? Sure, all kinds of people believe it.

Also, if you go back and look at where these ideas come from, you often find that these people have motivations to do it. You see what I'm saying? Yeah, but even Hillman and Ruck believe it, right? Sure, all kinds of people believe it.

Also, if you go back and look at where these ideas come from, you often find that these people have motivations to do it. You see what I'm saying? Yeah, but even Hillman and Ruck believe it, right? Sure, all kinds of people believe it.

You can't just say, I'm only listening to the people who say what I like. The other people, I'll ignore. Sure. What you have to believe in is a conspiracy amongst academia, which Graham Hancock and other people's push, which is absurd. There is no conspiracy.