Tristan Harris

And so from a chimpanzee life, so imagine there you are like inhabiting a chimpanzee mind body and you're conceptualizing from a chimpanzee brain, what are all the things that these like smarter chimps could do?

What are they gonna do, like take all the bananas?

And you can't imagine this super smart chimpanzee inventing technology, inventing drones, inventing nuclear weapons, inventing Einstein physics.

You can't even conceptualize it.

And we are building a technology that can conceptualize things of such power and magnitude that we are the chimpanzees.

We cannot conceptualize it.

It only took what, like 50 Nobel Prize level scientists to make the Manhattan Project, the nuclear bomb.

And it only took a couple Nobel Prize level scientists to make CRISPR, which is the ability to read and write DNA.

So if you can have a hundred million Nobel Prize winning sort of like minds working on creating new scientific discoveries, some of those things are going to be insanely dangerous.

And as Tristan says, we can't conceptualize them.

So the bottom line is we need to do...

We need to regulate, we need to have laws, and we need to have international limits on where the whole world does not have an interest in building dangerous AI that we lose control of.

Think about that China would not want the US to build dangerous AI that we lose control of.

The US doesn't want China to build AI that they lose control of, meaning that we all- But we're both racing to get to

What?

A crazier, more uncontrollable form of AI.

Because right now we're making AIs, there's a 2000 to one gap in the amount of money going into making AI more powerful than the money making AI more safe or controllable.

2,000 to one.

2,000 to one gap.

You said to me backstage that there's more regulation on a sandwich.