Tristan Scott

no i've never driven in a tesla when i had my emf but people have sent me videos i want to it'll be cool but it's really hard because like you saw in your house measuring radio frequencies is a bit challenging i'm like is your bluetooth off is that off like the baseline is very high so you you need to make sure everything is clean and i'm not going to lie i've seen videos online of people like measuring teslas and i'm like

no i've never driven in a tesla when i had my emf but people have sent me videos i want to it'll be cool but it's really hard because like you saw in your house measuring radio frequencies is a bit challenging i'm like is your bluetooth off is that off like the baseline is very high so you you need to make sure everything is clean and i'm not going to lie i've seen videos online of people like measuring teslas and i'm like

no i've never driven in a tesla when i had my emf but people have sent me videos i want to it'll be cool but it's really hard because like you saw in your house measuring radio frequencies is a bit challenging i'm like is your bluetooth off is that off like the baseline is very high so you you need to make sure everything is clean and i'm not going to lie i've seen videos online of people like measuring teslas and i'm like

I'm 90% sure their phone is on when they're recording the video.

I'm 90% sure their phone is on when they're recording the video.

I'm 90% sure their phone is on when they're recording the video.

Right. They're recording it with their phone, right?

Right. They're recording it with their phone, right?

Right. They're recording it with their phone, right?

So unless that's on airplane mode, people, and you've removed every other variable, you are not measuring something accurately from a radio frequency perspective. And then who knows how close the next cell tower is if you're in a public space. But yeah, so you said 5G, right? It's just everything is additive. We're subtracting nothing. And then everything else around us is getting worse.

So unless that's on airplane mode, people, and you've removed every other variable, you are not measuring something accurately from a radio frequency perspective. And then who knows how close the next cell tower is if you're in a public space. But yeah, so you said 5G, right? It's just everything is additive. We're subtracting nothing. And then everything else around us is getting worse.

So unless that's on airplane mode, people, and you've removed every other variable, you are not measuring something accurately from a radio frequency perspective. And then who knows how close the next cell tower is if you're in a public space. But yeah, so you said 5G, right? It's just everything is additive. We're subtracting nothing. And then everything else around us is getting worse.

But there's so much correlative data. There's tons of studies actually getting into the nitty gritty with like rodents. There was a interphone study. So people don't realize that the IARC, which is not some like... end-all be-all organization, like magnetic fields and radio frequencies. What does it stand for? International Agency of Research on Cancer. Okay.

But there's so much correlative data. There's tons of studies actually getting into the nitty gritty with like rodents. There was a interphone study. So people don't realize that the IARC, which is not some like... end-all be-all organization, like magnetic fields and radio frequencies. What does it stand for? International Agency of Research on Cancer. Okay.

But there's so much correlative data. There's tons of studies actually getting into the nitty gritty with like rodents. There was a interphone study. So people don't realize that the IARC, which is not some like... end-all be-all organization, like magnetic fields and radio frequencies. What does it stand for? International Agency of Research on Cancer. Okay.

They are both classified as possible carcinogens. And when they started first looking into radio frequencies in the late 80s, I think it was the EPA or one of these organizations, they did like a preliminary investigation and they recommended that it be classified as a probable carcinogen.

They are both classified as possible carcinogens. And when they started first looking into radio frequencies in the late 80s, I think it was the EPA or one of these organizations, they did like a preliminary investigation and they recommended that it be classified as a probable carcinogen.

They are both classified as possible carcinogens. And when they started first looking into radio frequencies in the late 80s, I think it was the EPA or one of these organizations, they did like a preliminary investigation and they recommended that it be classified as a probable carcinogen.

And then the White House did some like side quest and came up with some data and they were like, no, don't, don't do that. So there's been a lot of back and forth, but the... The study that the IARC did called the Interphone Study was from like 2000 to 2004. They spent millions of dollars to look at cell phone users and brain cancer. And this was 2000 to 2004.

And then the White House did some like side quest and came up with some data and they were like, no, don't, don't do that. So there's been a lot of back and forth, but the... The study that the IARC did called the Interphone Study was from like 2000 to 2004. They spent millions of dollars to look at cell phone users and brain cancer. And this was 2000 to 2004.