Unnamed Guest

Look, first of all, it was an opinion piece. People put like weight on it because it's in the Wall Street Journal. It was garbage. It was just absolute garbage. And so, you know, that's the problem is that, you know, you get these like big media outlets like Wall Street Journal and you put weight in it. But the weight should be on the on the value of the content.

They were just completely inaccurate. Whoever they were, I don't know who the writer is. And not only that, being an opinion piece, one thing I did notice, the attacks keep coming. They described, this is the first time, a new low. They described David Grush as a, quote, mental patient. And then it was hotlinked. I didn't even want to click it. Probably went to that Clippin Idiots article.

They were just completely inaccurate. Whoever they were, I don't know who the writer is. And not only that, being an opinion piece, one thing I did notice, the attacks keep coming. They described, this is the first time, a new low. They described David Grush as a, quote, mental patient. And then it was hotlinked. I didn't even want to click it. Probably went to that Clippin Idiots article.

They were just completely inaccurate. Whoever they were, I don't know who the writer is. And not only that, being an opinion piece, one thing I did notice, the attacks keep coming. They described, this is the first time, a new low. They described David Grush as a, quote, mental patient. And then it was hotlinked. I didn't even want to click it. Probably went to that Clippin Idiots article.

But it's the attacks on whistleblowers. It's the attacks on people who testified in front of Congress, under oath, And just trying to, you know, personally diminish the testimony, the content of what they said by calling them mental patients. David Grush was never a mental patient. And so that was a real, that was a new low. I guess they got to swing low now.

But it's the attacks on whistleblowers. It's the attacks on people who testified in front of Congress, under oath, And just trying to, you know, personally diminish the testimony, the content of what they said by calling them mental patients. David Grush was never a mental patient. And so that was a real, that was a new low. I guess they got to swing low now.

But it's the attacks on whistleblowers. It's the attacks on people who testified in front of Congress, under oath, And just trying to, you know, personally diminish the testimony, the content of what they said by calling them mental patients. David Grush was never a mental patient. And so that was a real, that was a new low. I guess they got to swing low now.

Absolutely. So the Wall Street Journal article and the timing of it and the title of it and it coming out. It was to discourage, you know, it's the old thing. You know, serious people don't have serious discussions about something so unserious. You know, that was like the 60s mentality about UFOs. Yeah, it was to discourage, you know, real reporting on the issue.

Absolutely. So the Wall Street Journal article and the timing of it and the title of it and it coming out. It was to discourage, you know, it's the old thing. You know, serious people don't have serious discussions about something so unserious. You know, that was like the 60s mentality about UFOs. Yeah, it was to discourage, you know, real reporting on the issue.

Absolutely. So the Wall Street Journal article and the timing of it and the title of it and it coming out. It was to discourage, you know, it's the old thing. You know, serious people don't have serious discussions about something so unserious. You know, that was like the 60s mentality about UFOs. Yeah, it was to discourage, you know, real reporting on the issue.

It's going to have the reverse effect because people know too much now. I do want to say, I think David Grush is an amazing pick to have to help with this task force in whatever limited ability that they can get done remotely. regarding UAP, I think even if he can't disclose everything to them, what he can do is put them in the right direction.

It's going to have the reverse effect because people know too much now. I do want to say, I think David Grush is an amazing pick to have to help with this task force in whatever limited ability that they can get done remotely. regarding UAP, I think even if he can't disclose everything to them, what he can do is put them in the right direction.

It's going to have the reverse effect because people know too much now. I do want to say, I think David Grush is an amazing pick to have to help with this task force in whatever limited ability that they can get done remotely. regarding UAP, I think even if he can't disclose everything to them, what he can do is put them in the right direction.

I couldn't think of somebody better to help with a congressional task force than David. I want to make that really clear because I think that positive things can come from this. Now, 60 minutes, you bring that up. Now, look, man, I might have a different opinion than you on this because I'm looking at some details that it's not only...

I couldn't think of somebody better to help with a congressional task force than David. I want to make that really clear because I think that positive things can come from this. Now, 60 minutes, you bring that up. Now, look, man, I might have a different opinion than you on this because I'm looking at some details that it's not only...

I couldn't think of somebody better to help with a congressional task force than David. I want to make that really clear because I think that positive things can come from this. Now, 60 minutes, you bring that up. Now, look, man, I might have a different opinion than you on this because I'm looking at some details that it's not only...

poorly sourced it's it's it's a lie it's it's it's misleading and and it really bothered me so let me get your opinions first on the 60 minute piece and then i want to tell you what i think well i'll be good cop to your bad cop um

poorly sourced it's it's it's a lie it's it's it's misleading and and it really bothered me so let me get your opinions first on the 60 minute piece and then i want to tell you what i think well i'll be good cop to your bad cop um

poorly sourced it's it's it's a lie it's it's it's misleading and and it really bothered me so let me get your opinions first on the 60 minute piece and then i want to tell you what i think well i'll be good cop to your bad cop um

I don't disagree, essentially, but they fucked up and they fucked up and they and they created false associations. And I'm sorry, I'm going to have to call it out. You know, it's like that. That's just kind of what we got to do, man. We got to keep it. But I see your point. And we're getting personal now. I know like Bill Whitaker and I know Graham.