Viva Frei

I just thought that that judge and as much as he's an idiot, a totally corrupt hack whose daughter worth mentioning every time we talk about him, his daughter was fundraising off of this prosecution that discredits the system. But I thought he had a little bit more savvy to say, all right, after the Supreme Court came down and said, you can't admit evidence that is a juice from presidential acts.

I just thought that that judge and as much as he's an idiot, a totally corrupt hack whose daughter worth mentioning every time we talk about him, his daughter was fundraising off of this prosecution that discredits the system. But I thought he had a little bit more savvy to say, all right, after the Supreme Court came down and said, you can't admit evidence that is a juice from presidential acts.

I just thought that that judge and as much as he's an idiot, a totally corrupt hack whose daughter worth mentioning every time we talk about him, his daughter was fundraising off of this prosecution that discredits the system. But I thought he had a little bit more savvy to say, all right, after the Supreme Court came down and said, you can't admit evidence that is a juice from presidential acts.

He would say, OK, I've got to vacate the verdict and blame the Supreme Court.

He would say, OK, I've got to vacate the verdict and blame the Supreme Court.

He would say, OK, I've got to vacate the verdict and blame the Supreme Court.

Without a question. And in his ruling, he says, look, none of the evidence related to presidential acts because it was all in furtherance of a private act of fraud, bullcrap. But even if it were, he says the error would be harmless because of the overwhelming evidence of guilt. I mean, this is like this is communist level. Find me the man.

Without a question. And in his ruling, he says, look, none of the evidence related to presidential acts because it was all in furtherance of a private act of fraud, bullcrap. But even if it were, he says the error would be harmless because of the overwhelming evidence of guilt. I mean, this is like this is communist level. Find me the man.

Without a question. And in his ruling, he says, look, none of the evidence related to presidential acts because it was all in furtherance of a private act of fraud, bullcrap. But even if it were, he says the error would be harmless because of the overwhelming evidence of guilt. I mean, this is like this is communist level. Find me the man.

I will find you the crime presumption of guilt, not innocence. But I thought he would have the good sense to say, OK, I can vacate this verdict, save my own face on appeal because it will get overturned on appeal. I agree with you on that and blame the Supreme Court. No. He went full throttle.

I will find you the crime presumption of guilt, not innocence. But I thought he would have the good sense to say, OK, I can vacate this verdict, save my own face on appeal because it will get overturned on appeal. I agree with you on that and blame the Supreme Court. No. He went full throttle.

I will find you the crime presumption of guilt, not innocence. But I thought he would have the good sense to say, OK, I can vacate this verdict, save my own face on appeal because it will get overturned on appeal. I agree with you on that and blame the Supreme Court. No. He went full throttle.

And Amy Coney Barrett, the turncoat that Robert Barnes on our show Sunday night warned about, she was the turncoat. And they say because this corrupt hack of a judge undertook informally not to impose a prison sentence, we'll go ahead and allow the sentencing. He could have he could have given Trump money in that sentence and they should not have allowed the judge to proceed with the sentence.

And Amy Coney Barrett, the turncoat that Robert Barnes on our show Sunday night warned about, she was the turncoat. And they say because this corrupt hack of a judge undertook informally not to impose a prison sentence, we'll go ahead and allow the sentencing. He could have he could have given Trump money in that sentence and they should not have allowed the judge to proceed with the sentence.

And Amy Coney Barrett, the turncoat that Robert Barnes on our show Sunday night warned about, she was the turncoat. And they say because this corrupt hack of a judge undertook informally not to impose a prison sentence, we'll go ahead and allow the sentencing. He could have he could have given Trump money in that sentence and they should not have allowed the judge to proceed with the sentence.

Yeah, and not just that also. And shame on you, Merchant, for not respecting our Supreme Court ruling. This is a Supreme Court, at least with Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett, who have no respect for their own rulings. They've made that public now. They issued a ruling. It said, you know, presidential immunity for core constitutional acts, presumption of immunity for...

Yeah, and not just that also. And shame on you, Merchant, for not respecting our Supreme Court ruling. This is a Supreme Court, at least with Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett, who have no respect for their own rulings. They've made that public now. They issued a ruling. It said, you know, presidential immunity for core constitutional acts, presumption of immunity for...

Yeah, and not just that also. And shame on you, Merchant, for not respecting our Supreme Court ruling. This is a Supreme Court, at least with Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett, who have no respect for their own rulings. They've made that public now. They issued a ruling. It said, you know, presidential immunity for core constitutional acts, presumption of immunity for...

in the middle acts and no immunity for personal acts, but you cannot adduce as evidence, evidence that was adduced as presidential conduct, which correspondence with chief of staff and press secretary obviously was on its face. And so what they basically said is we have no respect for our rulings either.

in the middle acts and no immunity for personal acts, but you cannot adduce as evidence, evidence that was adduced as presidential conduct, which correspondence with chief of staff and press secretary obviously was on its face. And so what they basically said is we have no respect for our rulings either.