Viva Frei
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
It's when you appreciate what they did and they took a 30, they turned what would otherwise been a misdemeanor bookkeeping error, a time barred misdemeanor into a 34 count felony charge indictment conviction to then give an unconditional discharge just so that they could call him a convicted felon. It was a scam from the beginning. The judge
It's when you appreciate what they did and they took a 30, they turned what would otherwise been a misdemeanor bookkeeping error, a time barred misdemeanor into a 34 count felony charge indictment conviction to then give an unconditional discharge just so that they could call him a convicted felon. It was a scam from the beginning. The judge
The only reason he gave the unconditional discharge is because any other sanction would have been obviously immediately appealed or unenforceable because Trump takes office in a week and a half. And so they get that header. The only question now is these scoundrels, what do they do with it?
The only reason he gave the unconditional discharge is because any other sanction would have been obviously immediately appealed or unenforceable because Trump takes office in a week and a half. And so they get that header. The only question now is these scoundrels, what do they do with it?
The only reason he gave the unconditional discharge is because any other sanction would have been obviously immediately appealed or unenforceable because Trump takes office in a week and a half. And so they get that header. The only question now is these scoundrels, what do they do with it?
Do they go for an impeachment 3.0 now that they actually have a crime to claim is the high crime and misdemeanor to go impeach him a third time? But it's it's corruption of the highest order. And you pointed it out. The audacity of them to accuse Trump of being the one who discredited the legal system. These people are Darvo narcissists. Darvo deny attack, reverse victim and offender.
Do they go for an impeachment 3.0 now that they actually have a crime to claim is the high crime and misdemeanor to go impeach him a third time? But it's it's corruption of the highest order. And you pointed it out. The audacity of them to accuse Trump of being the one who discredited the legal system. These people are Darvo narcissists. Darvo deny attack, reverse victim and offender.
Do they go for an impeachment 3.0 now that they actually have a crime to claim is the high crime and misdemeanor to go impeach him a third time? But it's it's corruption of the highest order. And you pointed it out. The audacity of them to accuse Trump of being the one who discredited the legal system. These people are Darvo narcissists. Darvo deny attack, reverse victim and offender.
The victimizers pretending to be the victims and pretending that the victim is the one who caused the distrust in the system when it's everything that they have done from day one to make people realize the legal system, at least in New York, is so corrupt. You got to get your stuff and pack up and leave because there's nobody is safe in New York.
The victimizers pretending to be the victims and pretending that the victim is the one who caused the distrust in the system when it's everything that they have done from day one to make people realize the legal system, at least in New York, is so corrupt. You got to get your stuff and pack up and leave because there's nobody is safe in New York.
The victimizers pretending to be the victims and pretending that the victim is the one who caused the distrust in the system when it's everything that they have done from day one to make people realize the legal system, at least in New York, is so corrupt. You got to get your stuff and pack up and leave because there's nobody is safe in New York.
A misdemeanor sounds like I'm misgendering the misdemeanor.
A misdemeanor sounds like I'm misgendering the misdemeanor.
A misdemeanor sounds like I'm misgendering the misdemeanor.
I think it's the Quebec way of doing it. But it was a time barred misdemeanor at worst. And they don't even know what they predicated the felony predicate acts on. Like you asked the jury, what did you convict him on? I don't know. He bookkeeping error. How did you how did you bump it up to a felony? Yeah.
I think it's the Quebec way of doing it. But it was a time barred misdemeanor at worst. And they don't even know what they predicated the felony predicate acts on. Like you asked the jury, what did you convict him on? I don't know. He bookkeeping error. How did you how did you bump it up to a felony? Yeah.
I think it's the Quebec way of doing it. But it was a time barred misdemeanor at worst. And they don't even know what they predicated the felony predicate acts on. Like you asked the jury, what did you convict him on? I don't know. He bookkeeping error. How did you how did you bump it up to a felony? Yeah.
But when the judge said you don't even have to identify which of the underlying felonies this predicate act was based on, you know that you're dealing with an outcome driven process and not a justice driven process.
But when the judge said you don't even have to identify which of the underlying felonies this predicate act was based on, you know that you're dealing with an outcome driven process and not a justice driven process.
But when the judge said you don't even have to identify which of the underlying felonies this predicate act was based on, you know that you're dealing with an outcome driven process and not a justice driven process.