Viva Frei

I just want to know, they're reducing these freak-offs or these sex things to just P. Diddy getting his rocks off, pun intended. That's what they've reduced these things down to when they were so much more than that.

I know that they've started naming some names or some celebrities, but when Diddy got arrested and people started going back in the internet time and pulling up videos that now, in retrospect, look highly suspect... The idea that they're reducing these sex parties to Diddy's own personal satisfaction is laughable.

I know that they've started naming some names or some celebrities, but when Diddy got arrested and people started going back in the internet time and pulling up videos that now, in retrospect, look highly suspect... The idea that they're reducing these sex parties to Diddy's own personal satisfaction is laughable.

I know that they've started naming some names or some celebrities, but when Diddy got arrested and people started going back in the internet time and pulling up videos that now, in retrospect, look highly suspect... The idea that they're reducing these sex parties to Diddy's own personal satisfaction is laughable.

And I think it's not realistic that what they're not revealing or what they're covering up is much more sinister and much more wide reaching than just Diddy looking to get his own sex.

And I think it's not realistic that what they're not revealing or what they're covering up is much more sinister and much more wide reaching than just Diddy looking to get his own sex.

And I think it's not realistic that what they're not revealing or what they're covering up is much more sinister and much more wide reaching than just Diddy looking to get his own sex.

I wouldn't venture any sort of professional opinion there, but my prediction would be the exact inverse, that he's going to get convicted on the transportation for prostitution, maybe on the trafficking, because I think it's very easy.

I wouldn't venture any sort of professional opinion there, but my prediction would be the exact inverse, that he's going to get convicted on the transportation for prostitution, maybe on the trafficking, because I think it's very easy.

I wouldn't venture any sort of professional opinion there, but my prediction would be the exact inverse, that he's going to get convicted on the transportation for prostitution, maybe on the trafficking, because I think it's very easy.

It will be not very easy, but the evidence is there now to lend credibility to the argument that Cassie was definitely physically beaten, extorted into it, and coerced into it. I think that's there. Then I think, you know, you get an acquittal or a non-conviction on the RICO, but he still goes to jail for 10, 20 years. I don't know if they run them concurrent or what's the other word? Consecutive.

It will be not very easy, but the evidence is there now to lend credibility to the argument that Cassie was definitely physically beaten, extorted into it, and coerced into it. I think that's there. Then I think, you know, you get an acquittal or a non-conviction on the RICO, but he still goes to jail for 10, 20 years. I don't know if they run them concurrent or what's the other word? Consecutive.

It will be not very easy, but the evidence is there now to lend credibility to the argument that Cassie was definitely physically beaten, extorted into it, and coerced into it. I think that's there. Then I think, you know, you get an acquittal or a non-conviction on the RICO, but he still goes to jail for 10, 20 years. I don't know if they run them concurrent or what's the other word? Consecutive.

Consecutive. But no, I think they get him on the easiest one. Right off the bat, the evidence is there. And I think it's not hard to show the coercion. Nobody wants to have a freak-off when they're having a urinary tract infection. She was physically beaten all they need to know. And if it happened once, it happened more than once.

Consecutive. But no, I think they get him on the easiest one. Right off the bat, the evidence is there. And I think it's not hard to show the coercion. Nobody wants to have a freak-off when they're having a urinary tract infection. She was physically beaten all they need to know. And if it happened once, it happened more than once.

Consecutive. But no, I think they get him on the easiest one. Right off the bat, the evidence is there. And I think it's not hard to show the coercion. Nobody wants to have a freak-off when they're having a urinary tract infection. She was physically beaten all they need to know. And if it happened once, it happened more than once.

To say that she freely did anything, I don't think any reasonable jury member's been involved.

To say that she freely did anything, I don't think any reasonable jury member's been involved.

To say that she freely did anything, I don't think any reasonable jury member's been involved.

To state the obvious, abject degeneracy. But set that aside. And again, Canadian lawyer never practiced criminal law, but we know the standard. Very smart man. Probative value needs to outweigh the prejudicial nature or the unduly prejudicial nature of the evidence.