Vivek Ramaswamy
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
So I'll respond to that. Sure. Obviously I'm not the candidate, but I'm going to give you my perspective nonetheless. I think we have seen some growth from Donald Trump over that first term in the experience of the 2020 election. And you hear a lot of that on the campaign trail. I heard a lot of that even in the conversation that he had with you.
So I'll respond to that. Sure. Obviously I'm not the candidate, but I'm going to give you my perspective nonetheless. I think we have seen some growth from Donald Trump over that first term in the experience of the 2020 election. And you hear a lot of that on the campaign trail. I heard a lot of that even in the conversation that he had with you.
So I'll respond to that. Sure. Obviously I'm not the candidate, but I'm going to give you my perspective nonetheless. I think we have seen some growth from Donald Trump over that first term in the experience of the 2020 election. And you hear a lot of that on the campaign trail. I heard a lot of that even in the conversation that he had with you.
I think he is more ambitious for that second term than he was for that first term. So I think that was the most interesting part of what you just said, is you're looking for somebody who has growth from their own experiences.
I think he is more ambitious for that second term than he was for that first term. So I think that was the most interesting part of what you just said, is you're looking for somebody who has growth from their own experiences.
I think he is more ambitious for that second term than he was for that first term. So I think that was the most interesting part of what you just said, is you're looking for somebody who has growth from their own experiences.
Say what you will, I have seen personally, I believe, some meaningful level of personal growth and ambition for what Donald Trump hopes to achieve for the country in the second term that he wasn't able to for one reason or another. You know, COVID, you could put a lot of different things on it, but in that first term.
Say what you will, I have seen personally, I believe, some meaningful level of personal growth and ambition for what Donald Trump hopes to achieve for the country in the second term that he wasn't able to for one reason or another. You know, COVID, you could put a lot of different things on it, but in that first term.
Say what you will, I have seen personally, I believe, some meaningful level of personal growth and ambition for what Donald Trump hopes to achieve for the country in the second term that he wasn't able to for one reason or another. You know, COVID, you could put a lot of different things on it, but in that first term.
Now, I think the facts of the backdrop of the 2020 election actually like really do matter. I don't think you can isolate one particular aspect of criticizing the 2020 election without looking at it.
Now, I think the facts of the backdrop of the 2020 election actually like really do matter. I don't think you can isolate one particular aspect of criticizing the 2020 election without looking at it.
Now, I think the facts of the backdrop of the 2020 election actually like really do matter. I don't think you can isolate one particular aspect of criticizing the 2020 election without looking at it.
Holistically, on the eve of the 2020 presidential election, we saw a systematic bureaucratically and government aided suppression of probably the single most important piece of information released in the eve of that election. The Hunter Biden laptop story revealing potentially a compromised U.S. presidential candidate. His family was compromised by foreign interests.
Holistically, on the eve of the 2020 presidential election, we saw a systematic bureaucratically and government aided suppression of probably the single most important piece of information released in the eve of that election. The Hunter Biden laptop story revealing potentially a compromised U.S. presidential candidate. His family was compromised by foreign interests.
Holistically, on the eve of the 2020 presidential election, we saw a systematic bureaucratically and government aided suppression of probably the single most important piece of information released in the eve of that election. The Hunter Biden laptop story revealing potentially a compromised U.S. presidential candidate. His family was compromised by foreign interests.
And it was suppressed as misinformation by every major tech company. The New York Post had its own Twitter account locked at that time. And we now know that many of the censorship decisions made in the year 2020 were actually made at behest of U.S. bureaucratic actors in the deep state threatening those tech companies to do it or else those tech companies would face consequence.
And it was suppressed as misinformation by every major tech company. The New York Post had its own Twitter account locked at that time. And we now know that many of the censorship decisions made in the year 2020 were actually made at behest of U.S. bureaucratic actors in the deep state threatening those tech companies to do it or else those tech companies would face consequence.
And it was suppressed as misinformation by every major tech company. The New York Post had its own Twitter account locked at that time. And we now know that many of the censorship decisions made in the year 2020 were actually made at behest of U.S. bureaucratic actors in the deep state threatening those tech companies to do it or else those tech companies would face consequence.
I think it might be the most undemocratic thing that's happened in the history of our country, actually, is the way in which government actors who were never elected to the government used private sector actors to suppress information on the eve of an election that, based on polling afterwards, likely did influence the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.
I think it might be the most undemocratic thing that's happened in the history of our country, actually, is the way in which government actors who were never elected to the government used private sector actors to suppress information on the eve of an election that, based on polling afterwards, likely did influence the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.